Neo Mujico
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
nekandro@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

US Republican warning of 'national security threat' is about Russia wanting nuke in space

abc7news.com

external-link
message-square
5
fedilink
29
external-link

US Republican warning of 'national security threat' is about Russia wanting nuke in space

abc7news.com

nekandro@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
5
fedilink
Republican warning of 'national security threat' is about Russia wanting nuke in space: Sources
abc7news.com
external-link
Two sources familiar with deliberations on Capitol Hill said the intelligence has to do with the Russians wanting to put a nuclear weapon into space.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Relevant:

    The U.S.’s Plans to Modernize Nuclear Weapons Are Dangerous and Unnecessary

    U.S. rushes to revive nuclear weapons industry as global tensions mount

    A gigantic new ICBM will take US nuclear missiles out of the Cold War-era but add 21st-century risks

    U.S. to Develop Unanticipated New Nuclear Bomb

    U.S. Withdraws From Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

    The U.S. Exit From the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty Has Fueled a New Arms Race

    Edit: for a dash of history, don’t forget

    Unilateral Withdrawal From the ABM Treaty Is a Bad Idea

    Did abandoning the ABM Treaty make America safer?

  • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If Russia is talking openly about it, I’m sure they’ve already done it.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Haven’t they already put cannons in space? This seems like the next logical step.

  • ralphio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Is there a reason they can’t use a conventional warhead to destroy a satellite? Even if they wanted to use it to attack a surface there isn’t a lot of evidence that a normal ICBM can be reliably intercepted so I doubt them being in space will change much.

    Edit: *surface target

  • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    russia’s space program is sort of shit these days though?

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 262 users / day
  • 840 users / week
  • 1.62K users / month
  • 5.03K users / 6 months
  • 9 local subscribers
  • 38.5K subscribers
  • 10.8K Posts
  • 22K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org