Why is this project so plagued with drama
IMHO, it’s just humans being humans. And while someone may excel in one, or many areas, they’re often lacking in others. And we see it all out in the open with projects like this!
There is a common denominator
I think that I agree with Lina on this one. This article heavily sides with Danilo and her initial message is clear enough : she asks to remain primary author. It should have ended there with Danilo saying “ok no prob, here it is corrected” and it would have ended there.
Any legal experts want to weigh in on whether this is even allowed? CC0 by definition has no limitations, but GPL very explicitly has limitations for what the code can be used for, and also applies to derivatives. If it was their own code but was officially submitted to the Linux repo, who owns it and gets to decide how the code can be licensed?
Removed by mod
Why is that name familiar…oh god he’s the one behind the LKML drama last month right
Removed by mod
This makes so much more sense.
