• piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    “President of Signal getting paid less than a principal engineer” must be the take here.

    The same argument applies to Wikipedia: it’s a blessing these people accept working for <1M. They could easily get a job for triple the salary elsewhere but choose to forfeit it for principles.

  • Chulk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m really trying hard to see the point that’s being made. Is it just the “high” salaries, or is there some other implication? The OP seems to be insinuating that Signal is a honeypot or something. I am going to need a lot more proof than, “hey, these guys work at a non-profit and they aren’t underpaid!” Given that most tech jobs offer stock options in addition to normal salary, it would make sense that base salary should be higher at a non-profit (where stock options don’t exist). Their salary structure also seems much flatter than other non-profits that I saw within the propublica link.

    What am I missing here?

    • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      14 days ago

      We already know it’s a honeypot, this is circumstantial evidence about their role in sapping donations from the wider open source ecosystem. Keep donating to them if you don’t value your money.

        • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yeah that’s why you guys focus on shit like “I was able to convince my grandma to use it” - you don’t understand what is wrong with Signal technically.

          • Chulk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            No, I focus on that because it’s real. It sounds like you don’t get out much, just judging by how you talk to people. So let me lay it out for you. People are resistant to change and you have to convince them. You aren’t good at that, which is why you’re so mad. I’m trying to get information to help convince people I know and love, which is why I’m asking for more information from the person who seems to know a lot. However you also seem to be bad at providing resources to back your claims up.

            • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              14 days ago

              No, not everyone who fails to relate to your American experience “fails to get out much”. It’s more than you’re incapable of understanding why someone would avoid centralizing “privacy services” in countries that run the global capitalist surveillance state. What you’re doing is derailing the thread + demanding spoon feeding + begging the question. Your motivation is a wounded ego because someone said you made a bad choice—one that is as easy to fix as installing and uninstalling services.

              • Chulk@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                Jesus Christ dude. I’m talking about how you are immediately hostile to everyone in this thread. Get over yourself.

                • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Get some good software on your devices that doesn’t have a lifespan according to the goodwill of the feds, and have a wonderful morning.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    Just hire from the EU. It’s cheaper and they are as competent. A lot more money will be left to hire more staff. I’ve already moved my signal donation to matrix.

    The US is a money sink.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I think that’s precisely what this is questioning : is this helping fund critical FOSS?

      What if a fraction of that money instead went to Signal infrastructure? Wikimedia? FSF which initially made GNU PG? FSFE? NLNet which supports Delta Chat? Sovereign Tech Fund? etc rather than individuals?

      I don’t think anybody is criticizing that hard working people contributing to a good project are well paid. I believe the question is rather what’s the cost to OTHER projects when there is 1 project, not an umbrella projects which funds others (again like NLNet or the Sovereign Tech Fund).

      What model are we reproducing and what’s the risk?

      FWIW the question isn’t new. It happens also with Mozilla with the compensation of its C-suite staff, not the “random” software engineer.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I think it clearly is helping. Signal is a mature, polished project. It is first-class. The infrastructure is obviously well-funded. As for other projects, I also wish they had more money but I don’t think it’s useful to criticize Signal for the fact that they don’t.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    not my circus, not my monkeys

    but them positions… as mr. cici famously quipped, that’s alot of buffers

    you really need a VP of eng and then a director of eng and further liaisons until you reach an actual engineer for a shop that has one product?

    again, what do I care, spend it in good health

    • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      This is basically a parody of the problems with NGO corporate compensation, yes, but I feel like everyone is avoiding the elephant in the room & wishing goodwill to people making e2ee messaging that is only safe for the US government to use. Ask yourself, would the German prime minister even trust this shit?

      It’s not like Delta Chat main development team is even exempt from this, not sure if OP is aware of this but they want the EU to save them. Fat chance guys! Open source developers need a workers government or total independence, or they will discover they are political tools that can be dispensed with when no longer necessary. Just look at the recent pressure on Linux to eject Russian developers.

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    US and the West are ‘managed’ by elite psychopaths that don’t give a shit about ordinary peoples ‘privacy’ or similar fancy tools for the wage-slaves. They have used these tools to try and break through specific nations/groups information defenses. ANYTHING sponsored by the US Oligarchy is either a part of local US control, or an attempt at reaching more people with rich-man propaganda in nations that defend themselves against US lies and color-revolutions…

  • Vegafjord eo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    Sallaries should act as a motivator for better leadership, so these wages, at least in norwegian context, seems to be too high, too corrupting.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    What is going on with all of these people saying CEOs or other employees deserve to live comfortably? The average salary in the US is like $64,000 the median is more like $38,000. What kind of person could possibly do the work of 10 or almost 20 (depending on weather you prefer median or average) regular people? If people should be payed based off how much work they do this is not a reasonable amount.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Tbf they are probably renting in california lol, their ‘pwese donate we need it’ always felt about as legitimate as 'hello from jimmy at wikipedia, we’re about to shut down the website, everyone please send $1 to the wikipedia guy, 432 evergreen tereace’

  • shaggyb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    If we’re going to continue doing capitalism, we need to celebrate when people who are responsible for quality products are paid comfortably but not so much that their pay disrupts other peoples’ status.

    700k very much qualifies in today’s world.

    Stop being crabs in a bucket.

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Edit: just looked closer and noticed that this is almost entirely the executive team. Duh. Obviously execs are overpaid as hell but for the size of Signal and the average exec pay this is hardly surprising


    Tbh I’d much rather the money go to the employees than to shady stakeholders/investors

    I feel like the takeaway here is that this is how much people SHOULD be getting paid and most of the time the rest is getting siphoned off by the capital class

    • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago
      • talk shit about a bad group chat app

      • angry group chat descends on shittalking

      • none of them have background information on Signal leaking metadata and even the entire message contents in some cases

      • mindless NGO executive worship

      • everyone clarifies they don’t value their privacy in the first place

      We will be doing this again next week. It’s lovely. Nobody seems to understand the downside of demonstrating an entire community has zero combined expertise by demanding spoon-fed information instantly. Lacking any sources that could criticize Signal.

      Do you think it could be related to sanitizing your websites with “anti-disinformation” strategies lifted directly from the people who spy on you & your family? No, no, that’s too far out. Inductive reasoning is impossible. You know this.

  • Sherad@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I barely use social media at all besides lemmy and the level of smarmy belligerence you’ve used throughout this thread makes me wanna download signal out of spite.

    Maybe take a day off mang.

  • raicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    What a scam…

    Hey guys I help orphans on a non profit, I’m a very good person. BTW I get paid 1M a year

    • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I would really love for some of the people here talking about how it’s a good thing this “talent” is retained to explain what it is exactly these people do. I am 100% certain they hate these people in their own companies. But somehow when they see it in an NGO corporate structure it’s all sunshine and daisies.

  • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    LMAO @ everyone who would have denied this was true groveling at the feet of the US government’s spectacularly abd inexplicably generous Open Technology Fund after devoting 3000 comments to bashing what remains of Firefox for [checks notes] making the UI better so the community doesn’t need to spend their time making sidebars and vertical tabs… You guys are worms. Today I get to be the rock. 🥴