ylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoUbisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that meanswww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down12
arrow-up154arrow-down1external-linkUbisoft insists yet again that its uncanny AI-generated 'NEO-NPCs' will make games 'more alive and richer', whatever that meanswww.pcgamer.comylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareHackworth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·1 year agoSo if they don’t hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you’re all good with gen AI NPCs?
minus-squareIzzyScissor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThose are not my ONLY issues, no. They’re the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just … Fluff for no reason other than to list “AI NPCs” on the box. Paying for more writers is simply better all around.
minus-squareHackworth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoAnd do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?
So if they don’t hallucinate, have object permanence, and are fun to talk to, you’re all good with gen AI NPCs?
Those are not my ONLY issues, no. They’re the most egregious for a videogame right now, but the entire concept is just … Fluff for no reason other than to list “AI NPCs” on the box.
Paying for more writers is simply better all around.
And do you believe paying for more writers will remain a better option for the foreseeable future?