bartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoAll lives rulesuppo.fiimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down15
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageAll lives rulesuppo.fibartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoGood is relative. And relatively speaking, one is definitely good compared to the other.
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s not good of its own merit though, it’s only good compared to something worse. Neither party represents the interests of the average working class individual.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoLiterally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”. “Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBoth are consistent within the confines of the definition.
Good is relative. And relatively speaking, one is definitely good compared to the other.
It’s not good of its own merit though, it’s only good compared to something worse. Neither party represents the interests of the average working class individual.
Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.
“Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
Removed by mod
Both are consistent within the confines of the definition.