I’ve been thinking of switching from btrfs to zfs but it seems like it’s quite a bit of work. Does anyone have any experience with this?

    • maxprime@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I like the idea of deduplication and checksumming to prevent bit rot. It also sounds like backups via snapshots is extremely powerful, but maybe that’s something btrfs can do too.

      Ultimately though it would be about learning. That’s what’s drawn me to Linux in the first place.

      • gi1242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        i used to use zfs for backups via snapshots. but I find using rsync and hard links is much more convenient. i can use standard tools to look through backups and track which files changed if needed.

  • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I used ZFS with Arch for a while, the volume manager was what I’d call the largest benefit; in my opinion nothing else comes close to being as useful and well integrated.

    I stopped because ZFS incompatibility with recent kernels (which I needed for GPU reasons) made me have to rescue my system more often than was ideal.

    Some other minor downsides:

    • boot can take ages due to ZFS using udev-settle.
    • deduplication status is… Complicated.
    • you’re kind-of stuck with the performance of your slowest vdev; L2ARC & a metadata device don’t really compensate well for a zpool that is predominantly a raid-z2 of spinning rust.