• TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not too surprising they didn’t change much. The switch was a huge hit so fixing things like the joycons, adding a stand, etc. was the way to go.

    My guess (hope) is that the only new titles exclusive to the switch 2 are ones that the original switch wouldn’t have the processor strength to play and that they won’t arbitrarily wall them but we’ll see.

    • PirateKingLuffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Unfortunately games have been struggling on the Switch’s hardware for a couple years. There were a few parts of the newest Pokémon game that felt like a slideshow presentation.

      • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Pokémon

        Is that still scarlet and violet? Because if so, I don’t think that was a problem with the switch.

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think so, there isn’t much else that can explain the classroom scene where half the class are all playing the same goofy animation at 5 frames per second, mostly in sync. It would have looked better to have them not moving at all, so at least some of the jank was a stylistic choice on gamefreak’s part.

      • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh I don’t want them to hold back new games performance just for the OG switch, that was pretty underpowered even when it came out. I’m hoping the switch 2 gets a good upgrade in the area since it’s needed.

        More for indie games and things like that was what I was thinking.