• Special Wall@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Except most extensions need to collect some data to work. Unless you want firefox to die, this isn’t a great idea.

  • Vincent@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I believe it was already required to disclose data collection, except you had to build the UI for that yourself. This makes it easier to comply, and more recognisable for us users.

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Calm down guys you’re asking for an actual feature, now… this is gonna need like five years of extensive study and testing.

      • Ferk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m not sure if that would be viable technically.

        They might be able to make requestable the connection requests to outside sources (which I expect is something many extensions use, even those without data collection), but whether those requests relate to data collection is not something that can be determined programmatically.

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yes, all access to outside sources is blocked by default and users are asked on a per URL basis with the author manually requesting each URL access including a reason – with occasional manual validation from Mozilla staff.