• krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      When I see what a hassle having kids is, how stressful it is, the expense, and dire prospects of a good economic future it makes no sense.

      The most cynical narcissist will have kids so someone will take care of them in their old age but how likely is that?

      I just don’t see why I’d want to. It doesn’t make sense.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s true that it’s not 100% a choice, but physically there’s nothing stopping people from having kids. People are (fairly) prioritizing their financial security over having kids.

      Though this may be a comment on abortion. In which case abortion is healthcare and a human right.

    • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would say that this is correct so long as we have the words informed choice based upon economic realities.

  • SGGeorwell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    Our leaders have abandoned their stewardship of our population in favor of stewarding only the accounts and balance sheets. If human needs are widely neglected the humans will stop reproducing.

  • wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The world is being destroyed, physically, economically, and culturally by a small and malignant infestation of greedy parasites. There is little hope for future so why would people want to bring their children into it?

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This comment is getting way too many upvotes. The world is not that bad and I’m sure 99% of people alive today would rather be alive than to never have been born. I’m not saying it’s that good but it’s not so bad that I would rather be not born.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        ‘Cause this is Lemmy.

        Look, I love this place and sympathize with the sentiment, but it’s also structured as a dramatized, extreme echo chamber. This neat little oasis amongst the burning internet is not (at least for me) representative of real life.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Chicken and egg scenario. The simplest position is that the economy screwed them first, making it almost entirely impossible to afford to bring up a family.

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m not sure if this is an issue due to capitalism, I think it’s an issue due to education and wealth. The more education and wealth a country has the lower average birth rate.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Do you see the nightmare the world has become? Of course they are having fewer kids. Why would you want to bring an innocent life into this horrific bullshit?

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s creating a snowball effect in Japan, as schools, daycares and kindergartens close down it’s getting harder and harder to find people to watch kids when people need to work. Most daycares have waiting list and point systems determining how much “need” a set of parents have for daycare because there’s not enough of them.