Reddit CEO says facial verification may be introduced. Ostensibly to prevent bots.

But we all know how dangerous this can be. But most likely Reddit users will just accept it.

Although they have a great free analogue right under their noses - Lemmy. Which is many times better than its competitor.

I wish more people would discover Lemmy, but that’s unlikely.

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I see the rationale, dead internet theory and all. The problem is that if this happened, I 100% believe Reddit would form a partnership with the US government or oil companies to put bots on their platform and spread misinformation.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Or? I think you mean and. Then throw several more ands in there, including AI platforms, surveillance tech, right wing PACs, and overall enshitification and misinformation.

  • Flyzeyez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Fuck reddit. I’ve been hanging on for too long until they banned me 3 times in 72 hours. I guess they don’t like criticism of the current regime. Fuck reddit.

  • Paranoid Factoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It took a lot of customer abuse to break Reddit’s stranglehold, but they are perilously close to a Digg like migration off their platform. Spez can take a hike into bankruptcy.

    • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s part of why I made my account here. Might as well start getting familiar with the alternative. That and the mods on Reddit are out of control handing out bans for jokes about violence. Like the other day, I joked we should shoot robot dogs and got handed a site wide 3 day ban.

  • TarnFan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I actually made my account here recently because of that post. I’d be surprised if I’m the only one. We may not get everyone on reddit, but a sizable chunk leaving and review bombing them in the app store could gain their attention.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You know if you have a printed piece of paper, a magazine. Or even a TV with a face on it, that a camera can’t tell if it’s a real human or not.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Requiring face ID AFTER genAI has become great at generating faces is certainly a decision

  • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    13 hours ago

    There’s no way they want to eliminate bot traffic, it would kill 2/3rds of their traffic instantly. So this just means, “bots that aren’t paying us.”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Reddit, very famously, used bot traffic at its inception to create the illusion of a community big enough to compete with Digg.

      It was the OG “fake it till you make it” business.

      As the company implements an increasingly draconian “ban every account that looks at me sideways” admin policy, I’m not sure if “2/3rds of the traiffc” isn’t lowballing it. There are entire threads - from initial post to bullshit bottom comment - that get created by bot traffic on the modern site. It’s a full blown hall of mirrors over there.

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        13 hours ago

        OG “fake it till you make it” business.

        Feels like 99% of “social” network startups. The dead Internet theory started before the LLM craze.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Goes back to email. Easier to create a machine that churns out digital messages than find humans to do the work manually. So you get increasing loads of spam and gibberish, attempting to out-shout one another in a digital space with no bureaucratic regulation or material limits.

          That said, one thing that made early social media like Facebook and MySpace and Livejournal appear valuable was the degree of human interaction. What’s more, the interpersonal networks that formed between verified humans gave enormous value to communications across the platform.

          Facebook did a pretty good job, early on, of limiting who could join based on authentication through college admin offices. MySpace had a large cohort of real human artists producing real human music, which attracted a real human following. Livejournal predated a lot of advertisement-by-blogging. After the Dot-Com bubble burst, this is where you could see green shoots of economic value in a digital space.

          We’ve demolished all that chasing fictitious capital. How valuable it was in practice is debatable, of course. But it’s all gone now.

              • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                Take mine too. It’s really funny how tumblr banned porn so all the gooners went to twitter and now tumblr is kinda healthy with a really vocal userbase that WILL backlash at any attempt on enshittifying the platform

                The biggest con with tumblr is the CEO, but he’s too busy making everyone distrust Wordpress.

      • krisevol@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I read somewhere that it’s estimated that reddit is 90% bots in the comments, and we already know 99% of front page context is from bots accounts.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      JUST IN: Reddit CEO says company is considering requiring all bots on the platform to click on ads in order to drive revenue to Reddit.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If not already, I assume they’ll offer a for-fee API for bots.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Yeah…that’s it…bots…you don’t want to associate all the post history and behavioral data with a real live person and connect whatever data you can find on the open data market with the same real person, collating everything the internet knows about a person into a single profile, destroying anonymity completely, ushering in a new age of Internet censorship and repression and aiding the identification of target groups for political and commercial exploitation? Nah…you wouldn’t want to do that, would you?