Its always good to try!

  • razen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    How come Linux worked on desktop but on phones it is having such a hard time even tho Android has the linux kernel( i think).

    Is PC hardware more open and known to everyone about everything while mobile dosent? And if that is the case then why arent phone opening itself for support?

    • peskypry@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Because ARM is a fucking mess. Each device has it’s own way of booting. There’s no standard like UEFI or BIOS.

      Plus you need propreitary code for modem to support 2G, 3G, 4G…etc. which are complicated to implement.

      • viov@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Would that be a good focus? To get a unified standard for ARM developed to get many devs together to make software/OS’es for it and adapt phones to use those OS’es

  • furtiveParalysis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Fairphone and samsung are absolutely not the same kind. I want to point fairphone is officially distributing /e/OS which is a niche of 2-3 brands. This company that is nowhere in size close to samsung also engages hardcore in device repairability making its phones be a flagship. If anything just let them be successful and tempt others to follow their lead. I would love graphene os to be better supported but just don’t put all the strain on the one doing good. (I type this from my FP6 /e/OS)

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have a newer Pixel phone and I’m comfortable installing and running custom ROMs from doing so regularly back in the day - for those who’ve daily driven both, what are the reasons I should NOT switch from the stock OS to GrapheneOS?

    • Matt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Plus Odin is a pain to work with as you have to rely on leaked tools (Odin3 for Windows and Odin4 for Linux) to do anything official.

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Sure would be the toppiest of tops!

      We can encourage them to work together in their official communication channels too!

      Would be good for both of them on every level. GrapheneOS learning to make their own phones, and Fairphone learning to make an OS while both being partnered

      Edit: Be the change you want to see everybody!! Flood the gates with what we want!

      • thomasshikari@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Graphene already has a partnership with Motorola now so the assumption is some time (I’ve seen 2027 speculated) we may get a Graphene Phone from Motorola. Mixed feelings about them partnering with a company like that but we’ll see how it goes. I still keep thinking about finally getting a secondhand pixel 10 so I can switch to Graphene from apple.

        • viov@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I would recommend it. Very worth it overall (As a user of a similar Pixel phone)

          What are your use cases?

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fairphone? perhaps. Samsung? hell naw. Samsung heavily benefits from the spyware it builds into One UI and 99% of its user base do not care about the spyware.
    But I do hope hope that Fairphone begins to embrace Linux support.

    • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Samsung heavily benefits from the spyware it builds into One UI and 99% of its user base do not care about the spyware.

      They go out of their way to ensure that it cannot be disabled even if you do care about the spyware and try to uninstall or disable it.

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Both tantalizingly close with respect to GrapheneOS. I wouldn’t expect Samsung to ever support the other two, but their phones are supposed to have every security element GOS expects. Only problem is that Samsung wants to make their own walled-garden ecosystem a la Apple.

    I do remember reading somewhere that GrapheneOS are open to someone making a GSI (generic system image) port that would work with phones like Fairphone, which GOS don’t want to officially support due to a lack of security features. I wonder if anyone has started work on such a thing.

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s true but you never know maybe in future they will. Definitely don’t see them doing it now. It would definitely be a hop on the wagon moment for them

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    The short term is forked android. The long term is a Linux distribution, new or otherwise. It doesn’t seem reasonable to assume that the proprietary blobs in Android will get reverse engineered.

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      That will definitely be the focus. If Europe people can mandate making Android and Apple Ecosystems be opened to having real GNU/Linux or anything else they want to be able to be put on it then that would make huge changes to getting that to happen

    • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is also shiftphone. Thats less extreme to fairphone when it comes to fairness but very repairable