I’m just curious how the far-right is framing these developments, and how it differs per country.

Are they mostly talking about the “pyromaniacs”?

Or about how governments failed to do organize the (supposedly normal) periodic low intensity fires to prevent the big ones?

Or are they simply not talking about it at all?

If you have any concrete links to local media, I would be very curious!

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    France. They blame ecologists and scientific for not having been “convincing enough” about climate crisis.

  • ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I had a lady at a coffee shop tell me about how the California fires are created by nuclear powered space lasers the US sold to China that they’re now using for climate terrorism against the US.

    She also told me that her grandma had Obama’s birth certificate.

    People are… interesting.

  • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re back to only talking about migrants.

    Shout out to the farmers protesting for cheaper diesel when we had a green gov 2-3 years ago and now crying for subsidies because the dryness is killing their crops. Some real smart salt of the earth

  • KurtVonnegut@mander.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    For example: Vlaams Belang (far-right in Belgium) is all indignant about how the country supposedly spent too much on climate mitigation (something they have always fought) and not enough on climate adaptation.

    See for example this piece on their website about the forest fires, titled: “forget about the climate church, start investing in climate adaptation”.

    • Sailing7@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Over here in germany i also had some news channel or radio or something say something regarding this.

      It was said that the statement - that we did too less in adaption and should have saved ressources for that by investing less in climate mitigation - is utter bullshit and we should have invested more in both and that this new discussion is stupid.

      Wanted to point that out since it seems like our right wing idiots have the same talking points as yours.

      Almost feels like this entire discussion is another one of those big right wing investor/media mogul type of discussion thats being forced onto society by right wing media shills.

  • clanker_victim_555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They deliberately misunderstand “human caused” to mean arson. Then try to whip up anger against the “arsonists”.

    Human caused is literally anything other than lighting strikes.