Iran accused the United States of “economic terrorism” and “crimes against humanity” on Thursday, after Washington said it would ramp up sanctions to heap pressure on Tehran.

“Undoubtedly, the US economic sanctions against Iran, which have targeted the fundamental human rights of every Iranian citizen, are a case of ‘economic terrorism’ and ‘crimes against humanity’, and the perpetrators and instigators of these sanctions are deserving of trial and punishment for committing such heinous crimes,” Iran’s foreign ministry said in a statement carried by state media.

    • narwhal@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Such measures in which you use economic weight to purposely cause harm to another nation should at least be recognized as an act of war, so that a response is warranted by international law, including by military means.

      • 5318008@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        We would need a LOT of new international guidelines for this.

        It’s not clear to me where we would draw the line, since there’s not really an enforceable difference between, “Allowing you to use our financial system is causing us harm, so you can’t do that anymore,” and “You can’t use our financial system until you <insert demands here>.”

        While a blockade is recognized as an act of war, an embargo is not. The US sanctions usually operate like a specific, services-based embargo, so there’s no interpretation of CURRENT international law rendering it an act of war. Again, we would need new guidelines to meet your goal.