i feel like its the opposite everyone thinks they are in it even tho it doesnt exists

Yes but classical liberalism only sought to understand it, that is THE distinction between classical liberalism and liberalism.

Father of modern capitalism really is just wrong maybe father of classical liberalism would be more like it, he never argued for capitalism like modern liberals do he simply described it with enthusiasm as an emerging and positive force, which in his time it was.

While its true that thru time peasant worked for their landlord quite a bit less than people work today, they also had to maintain themselves u know grow their own food, repair their homes, make or repair tools, make food, make clothes, make furniture all that kinda stuff; most historians would say peasants in europe generally worked more than we do today. They did have a lot of holidays tho.

you heretic, i demand satisfaction for this insult

soooo… u know how libs say leftist memes are walls of text…

idk in my admittedly limited experience employers have been perfectly open about what they pay.

my point was not that he was pro capitalist but that he would be, since again he went around spreading imperialist propaganda. Liberals today give all kinds of lip service about billionaires being to rich and shit or corporations being too powerful and then turn around and show their true colors when it comes to the global south. And the reality of how he has been used to justify imperialism right before it became capitalism and while capitalism existed and today leaves very little doubt about what his teaching were all about.

how is jesus anti capitalist this guy was going around spewing imperialist propaganda.