The right wing factions pretty much say they’ve been guaranteed as much.

https://theconcernedbird.substack.com/p/elon-musks-and-xs-role-in-2024-election

We have excess focus just no control over its direction.

Naive

He didn’t bully him, he made him a deal he couldnt refuse with the greenlight to go full steam ahead on the west bank and return to gaza once the heats died down

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/netanyahu-offers-deals-to-smotrich--ben-gvir-to-secure-cease

‘Guys, we can now annex the west bank, go back and fuck up Gaza whenever we want with US supports. Let’s take the optical win’

You can install TikTok too. Ban isn’t in effect yet.

Xiaohongshu is also banned.

It’s not ‘full collectivisation’ in the Marxist sense. But many branches like anarcho-communism and anarcho-syndicalism are pretty explicitly collectivist in nature. And most types of anarchism rely on voluntary collectivism to work. Mutual cooperation based on a set of logical accepted principles. Individuals can’t dismantle hierarchy. So I reject the notion it’s individualism to the extreme. It simply rejects enforced collectivisation. Instead emphasising voluntary and decentralised participation.

Anarchists seek to create a fully decentralised and democratic structure devoid of classes. Centralised structures alienate individuals from decision-making and consolidate power at the top, reducing actual democratic participation. Anarchism, while focusing on immediate spheres of influence, fosters direct democracy, ensuring individuals have a meaningful voice in their communities. Federated networks allow for broader cooperation without sacrificing local autonomy. To be truly resilient we need to rebuild from the bottom-up.

So I’m an agorist because I don’t think a classless, stateless society can be achieved through coercive or centralised means. The methods of change have to reflect the desired society, ensuring that the revolution does not replicate the hierarchies it seeks to abolish.

And it seemed like the only praxis where I could make tangible contributions and help push us forward in a world growing increasingly distant from any traditional revolution of the proletariat.

That sounds more like the ancaps. Anarchists want to dismantle all hierarchy not just the state. With various different flavours of solutions of voluntary collectivism.

Agorism is not authoritarian because it doesn’t rely on coercion or centralized power. The goal is to undermine the state and oppressive hierarchies through voluntary counter-economics, not to seize or reverse the mechanisms of control like Soviet Democracy does. It’s about opting out of their system entirely, not “oppressing” the ruling class…any harm they face is the result of losing their ability to coerce others so I’m not sure why you think it’s authoritarian.

Marxist praxis depends on centralized authority, party structures, and coercion to achieve its goals. Historical Marxist revolutions institutionalized these mechanisms long after their revolutions, whereas anarchist praxis, even in Revolutionary Spain, aimed for decentralized power. The labor camps you mentioned were temporary measures during wartime, not inherent. But yeah it’s a spectrum not binary ‘auth or not’, some types of anarchists are more likely to resort to authoritarian measures during the transition. Agorism aims to side-step most of that by building parallel systems.

It doesn’t demand an end to hierarchy not sure what you mean.

Counter economics in the agorist sense.

Everyone. How do you keep the working class capitalist simps in line until classes are abolished?

A counter-economic revolution could be anti-authoritarian. The creation of parallel institutions that bypass and outcompete existing structures.

Marxists are ideologically liblefts the whole way, sure. But through an auth praxis

Enforcing obedience at the expense of personal liberty.

Well goal is maybe the wrong word but objectively it does get less authoritarian over time if it goes as planned.

Goal is to get less authoritarian over time though?

Anarchists have a similar critique of capitalism but see it being solved through horizontal and voluntary means so I’m not sure how it’s misleading.

On the contrary, it’s is a useful heuristic, even if it’s not perfect. While ideologies are complex and multifaceted, it provides a framework to map tendencies. It simplifies ideologies, sure- but that’s precisely its value & the social/cultural dimension and is harder to map

It’s an oversimplification and has its limitations but that’s often what’s needed to reach mass appeal and be useful in discourse.

Communism as the praxis (marixism, etc) it’s auth-left whereas the end goal is lib-left (stateless).

Liberalism is auth-centre-right.

They are incompatible because leftism is anti capitalist.

Liberals are auth right on the political compass.

Leftism is anti-capitalist.