Classic microsoft, making the worst possible version of something, and somehow finding a way to force everyone to use it.
Classic microsoft, making the worst possible version of something, and somehow finding a way to force everyone to use it.
…but some nerds are more equal than others.
I’ll never understand why my classmates prefer python to R.
Safe code is a skill, not a feature.
The secret to success in software engineering:
I’ve heard an ex microsoft employee said in a blog once that the windows team has no seniors. Anyone who has worked there for one or two years has left for better employers. Nobody knows how to refactor or maintain old codebases, so instead, they just write new things on top of the old things. The windows kernel has hardly changed since XP.
I’ve wondered why programming languages don’t include accurate fractions as part of their standard utils. I don’t mind calling dc, but I wish I didn’t need to write a bash script to pipe the output of dc into my program.
This is an affront to nature. Comments shouldn’t even make it past the scanner.
Memory safety is a skill, not a feature.
The face of a man desperately trying to convince the world that c++ has made c obsolete, so that more people may share in his misery.
They had a good thing going. YouTube was far from unprofitable. But the skyrocketing density and plummeting quality of ads drove people to adblockers.
I suspect though, the day will soon come when ad-space is no longer quite so valuable.
“I need you to tell me how we can incorporate ai in our product.”
“Ai? How could ai possibly benefit our product?”
“Don’t ask me that. you’re the engineer, you should know.”
“Well, then I’m telling you the product has nothing to gain from incorporating ai.”
“Fine, I’ll keep looking until I can find someone with actual vision. See you at your performance review.”
People make fun of me for preferring C above any other language, but I think I’m the one having the last laugh.
What is it about python users just refusing to adapt to other languages?
its the things I hear from real software developers that concern me:
the more i learn about software development, the more i feel I’ve dodged a bullet by changing my major to electrical engineering.
You know, when I typically ask a question on SO, its because I want to learn how that thing works, or how to write it myself. I usually say as much, but the SO folks are too focused on the ends, they completely neglect the means. Chances are I’m already aware of that no-code solution, but that’s not what I’m asking for.
SO in a nutshell:
“I need to do X”
“Have you tried Y?”
“No, because I don’t need Y, I need X.”
“Well you can do Z if you can’t do Y.”
“OK, sure. But how do I do X?”
“Why do you need to do X?”
(Explains why in my hyper-specific situation, I need to do X, and Y and Z won’t work)
This question has been marked as a duplicate of “How to do Y”
at least then you’re dealing with the laws of nature instead of man-made BS. if you’re like me and have 0 tolerance for BS, it’s an absolute win.
The c build system that comes with visual studio. You pretty much have no choice but to use it if you’re writting c on windows.