• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Dialectical Materialism

    How about “a tug-of-war between owners and workers for jobs, resources, and technology”

    Three examples:

    Factory Work and Labour Unions

    Early 20th-century factory jobs involved long hours, low pay, and unsafe working conditions. When workers tried to unionize, factory owners often resisted, viewing unionized labour as a threat to profits. This created a direct conflict: owners wanting to keep costs low vs. workers demanding better wages and safer workplaces.

    Automation in Warehouses

    Warehouses (e.g., Amazon fulfilment centres) are increasingly adopting robotic systems to speed up sorting and packing. Employees might feel pressure to meet higher performance metrics set by a partly automated workflow, while also fearing that further automation will reduce human jobs. Here, the “tug-of-war” is between technological efficiency (and profit) vs. workers’ job security and well-being.

    Tech Industry Outsourcing

    Companies sometimes outsource tech-related jobs to countries with cheaper labour costs. This lowers expenses for the company but can lead to local layoffs and economic hardship for employees in higher-wage regions. The conflict revolves around the benefit of increased profit margins for the company vs. the material needs of domestic workers who lose their livelihoods.


  • NostraDavid@programming.devtoMemes@lemmy.mlAmericans and socialism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The USA actually spends several billions, if not trillions on Medicare (meant for the old) and Medicaid (meant for the poor, and single mothers, and young children) combined.

    In 2023, the federal government spent about $848.2 billion on Medicare, accounting for 14% of total federal spending.

    source - and that’s just Medicare.

    I agree with you that it’s weird that corporations get a bailout, instead of selling the company to competitors, but no need to act like the USA doesn’t spend a TON of money on its citizens, keeping their head above water :)


  • NostraDavid@programming.devtoScience Memes@mander.xyzErasure
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Typical American response.

    Alright, calm down, no need to insult me like that!

    I’m just getting sick of the keyboard warriors that bitch and moan on the internet about the situation, yet have exactly zero plans to do literally anything about it. They could write to their representatives, they could work towards Dems winning local elections, they could become politically active by demonstrating, etc.

    But all I see are online complaints; no plans. Storming the Capitol should be option Z, but maybe Americans can start with Plan A, eh?


  • NostraDavid@programming.devtoScience Memes@mander.xyzErasure
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fuck these nazis.

    Are you going to storm the Capitol like your granddads stormed the beaches of Normandy? Are you going to only bitch about it on the internet, or are you actually going to do something about it - storming the Capitol not necessarily has to be a part of it - you can plan a better alternative.


  • The “Infinite monkey theorem” concerns itself with Probability (the mathematical field). It has been mathematically proven that given the random input (the mathematical kind - not the human-created kind) of the monkeys, and the infinite time, the probability of the “complete works of William Shakespeare” rolling out of the typewriter in between the other random output is 1.

    It’s a mathematical theorem that just uses monkeys to speak to the imagination, not a practical exercise, other than to prove the maths.

    You should look into another brain-breaking probability problem called the “Monty Hall Problem”. Note that some of the greatest mathematical minds of the time failed said puzzle. Switching 100% increases the chance of winning. No, it won’t guarantee a win, but it will increase your chances, mathematically.




  • “for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God” - Exodus 20:5

    Says it all, really. This whole character trait is that he’s a jealous little asshole. He’s like Dolores Umbridge.

    I’m aware Christians may make counter-claims, but I’ve read the old testament, and all he does is to come off as an absolute asshole - you either worship me, or else!

    I wasn’t too surprised (but it made sense) that he (Elohim) originally came from the Canaanitic pantheon. How else can you be the only god, yet people shouldn’t worship other gods? He’s not, that’s how.

    /rant








  • NostraDavid@programming.devtoScience Memes@mander.xyzAcademic writing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I asked ChatGPT to convert the text to common words:

    “Academic writing is often hard to understand because it uses complicated words specific to a particular field, making it easier for experts to communicate with each other but harder for outsiders to follow. This keeps certain knowledge limited to a small group of people and maintains a cycle where only the educated or ‘in’ crowd can fully engage, while others are left out.”