Should have the cigar smoking guy asking how much cheaper it would be if it were polluting instead.

This is good thing for the dozen or so people benefiting from our unlimited funding to defense contractors and of course a bad thing for literally everyone else.

Partitioning is one of those obsolete Unixisms that is best left in the 90s. Only exception is dual booting, but even there partitioning isn’t really very important anymore

Agreed. Also dog’s do not belong in cities.

This is a great thing. Not even joking. No more coal and Energy exports? Perfect. Agriculture has to be sold locally and thus subject to the Agriculture Bill pricing ceiling and supply mandates? Great. (obviously the ag bill has a lot of room for improvement, but I digress.)

Private prisons are paid per-head.

What’s up with people expecting the government to issue a licenses for explicit constitutional rights?

Oy! Where’s your permit to peaceably assemble?
Hope you gotta a loisence for that news paper!
Let’s see some ID before you vote.
Oh you don’t want your home to be a barracks? Hope you paid the appropriate fees and filled out the forms.

Pure liberalism.

Why does even a modern language syntax insist on having end of line characters like semi colons. Surely we have moved beyond that. What is even the point of those characters?

No idea about the raw idealized intelligence. However one of the biggest advantages humans have as far as societal living and advancement is language, both spoken AND written. Spoken languages are fairly niche amongst species of the world though there is evidence of many mammalian species that have at least the basics of it.

However written language is unique to humans. That alone regardless of any other measurable aspect of “intelligence,” has placed human society firmly at the top of the earthly animal kingdom.

Hell yea. 100% taxes for all import and export of fossil fuels same with SUVs.

This is a comfortable lie that liberals tell themselves. But the real answer is that the blue party of Capital has no intention of doing the milquetoast things that Bernie says let alone what leftists imagine. Racism is merely an excuse, and people like you buy it.

Where are the hexbear people with their image macro’s. I need the one of Netanyahu with the cartoonish bomb.

Ah found it. This is from like 2004 or something. e: apparently 2012 67th United Nations General Assembly meeting Sept. 27, 2012

Sounds like the perfect evolution of pointers then.

I “understood” on a basic level what pointers were when i was first learning programing as a 12-13year old. But I never understood HOW to use them, or manipulate them, or what functions you use to interact with them, or how to examine them, or how to declare them, etc etc. And since I was young I never got the opportunity to take an actual programming class that taught any of that throughout high school. By the time I got to college I went with Electrical Engineering instead of computer science and so my journey with pointers ended.

Now I do python and never have to think about pointers.

Yea lack of glasses probably a different reporter. But the fact that it is a different reporter shows that CNN could have accommodated the Iranian Presidents demands if they wanted to, then the fact that they accommodated the al qaeda guy shows it was never about the head scarf or Islam or anything like that.

Can we please PLEASE start linking the actual tweet in the future. You can also screen shot it/copy and paste the content if you want, but PLEASE screenshots of tweets are the worst thing on the internet.

So I think by reading the comments I understand the context here.

A CNN reporter, Amanpour, was going to interview the Iranian President. The president demanded the female wear a head scarf. The CNN reporter declined because she is a strong independent woman or something, so the Iranian president didn’t show up. This same reporter then interviewed a former member of ISIS/Al Qaeda, and now suddenly she is wearing a headscarf. However for some reason interviewing this Al Qaeda member while wearing a headscarf is more important then whatever principles she supposedly has?

The implication is that she had no intention of conducting a good faith interview of the Iranian President at all. Is this correct?

If it’s not him it seems it would be trivial to prove that, but if any of the information provided to us by law enforcement is true (yea I know big if, but why would a random cop in pennsylvania lie about finding the suspect?) then it’s certainly him.

I don’t understand how this guy planned the assassination, the escape from NYC and then 3days later he sitll has all the evidence linking him to the crime on his person, and he is still on a Greyhound bus instead of chilling at home, or camping in the woods or something, anything else.

An interesting bankruptcy, one where the entity stay intact and still provides service (for now), but the capitalist part of the business gets swapped around.