Basically everything you stated, Bluetooth, Controller and GPU is hardware.
Your experience is probably different since you still think and act like you use windows. This is normal. When you are used to something and then switch to something that works differently you will run into problems.
Looks like you used hardware that was designed for windows and are blaming it now on Linux.
I am not understanding the issue you have that requires signing of drivers.
Yes some Bluetooth devices lack the support from the manufacturer’s for Linux, the Controllers i have used work great, at least for my needs.
Controllers have better support Linux for ages. Not understanding the issue here either.
Troubleshooting on Windows sucks at least to the same degree. The same non specific error message gets you 50 possible solutions.
No need to announce your departure.
TL;DR - Quantum computing is great, if you’re the bad guy. For the rest of us, there’s a cost/value tradeoff in defending against quantum computing threats. People will tell us it’s too much hassle to upgrade our encryption, but it can be done with reasonable effort.
And a big point is, it is a technology that we have to develop anyway, since big targets like governments, military or big financial or economic companies would want to defend against anyway.
To my knowledge there exists exactly one reactor in china, and this is a test project. We know very little about it. I have seen many many talks in the last 10ish years but for such a “break trough idea” very very little actual physical proof for any of the big claims.
Edit: Wikipedia article of said reactor: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TMSR-LF1
Full disk encryption on everything. My Servers, PCs etc. Gives me peace of mind that my data is safe even when the device is no longer in my control.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_ramdisk
In Linux systems, initrd (initial ramdisk) is a scheme for loading a temporary root file system into memory, to be used as part of the Linux startup process. initrd and initramfs (from INITial RAM File System) refer to two different methods of achieving this. Both are commonly used to make preparations before the real root file system can be mounted.
As i said 2 different things, initrd was used to create a ramdisk, a block device. Initramfs basically directly offers a filesystem instead of a block device.
systemd has now a interface called systemd-initrd: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/docs/INITRD_INTERFACE.md
initrd was deprecated see here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/14/1508
Initramfs and initrd are 2 different things, the problem where the confusion happens is that initrd is deprecated since a few years.
Now, systemd has implemented an interface called systemd-initrd which basically is initramfs.
I guess here is were the confusion lies. Nowadays everything is initramfs even if it called initrd.
The original initrd differs from initramfs, but it is no longer a thing.
Sorry if i came across a little bit snappy have not had a great week so far.
deleted by creator
That they are 2 different tools. Here
Nope, both do the same thing but they are not the same thing.
Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance so i can open a
.docxwith any program and be usable anywhere.
That’s an impossible task. Not even Microsoft manages that. Do not want to count how often i used libreOffice to repair or convert an older MSOffice file so it can be opend with modern Versions of MSOffice.
Once there was a 500MB Excel Sheet with lime 500-1000 used Cells, opened and saved it to.a xlsx file using libreOffice and reduced it to a few MB while still being fully functional.
Yes you have. Please explain to me the additional context. I seem to not grasp it.
What else are they doing then asking? Doing some marketing around it? If you get pressured by that you should not lead a company.
If you don’t want a permissive license don’t license your software that way, your motivation clearly doesn’t align with these licenses anyway.
Why does asking for money not align with the licenses?
Any software potentially has security issues. The matter is how they deal with it.
That is why you use an open source manager. KeePassXC for example is not owned by a for-profit company.
Losing the container due to corruption disk failure etc can be easily managed with backups.
Losing the password. Yes this is a real valid scenario. I personally have no problem with that i manage fine for years without having to write it out on paper to backup it. A solution would be to actually write that password out somewhere and hide it/ put it into a safe. An attack then needs to attack both, depending if you use disk encryption it is easy to get access to the password safe or not. There are other things to consider, like you could try to hide it in a very long string of characters like 20 pages of random characters, even if you forget it you will be able to find it cause it is very likely that you remember a few characters.
I know a lot of services that log you out regularly. Or need a password when you change settings or whatever.
Well yea people with the “I don’t care. I just press the button and it always works” model do exist.
WTF no. Password managers are reasonable secure. That is no i don’t care behavior.
And when you are worried about password managers you should not use cookies. Stealing a cookie is much more simple than stealing and encrypting your password safe.
Differences in the thread model. And of course convince. How to you backup your paper regulary? How do you transfer it? What if you need to access a pasdword when you are not home?
Most ppl will just reuse or use very weak passwords when they have to write every password they have to enter.
Best we have and probably will ever have on the current web. Not sure what the problem is with password managers?
Qualcomm did work together with Microsoft and the Vendors closely together before the launch to create those devices.
Linux device vendors probably did not get the same treatment. So give it time. Also, why not buy a windows laptop and put linux on it?
On most systems copy pasting is heavily insecure since a lot of processes have access to the clipboard. autotype and thinga like browser extensions are considered more secure.