• 4 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 19th, 2023

help-circle

  • “It’s crucial that your support for Ukraine doesn’t decrease but instead continues and grows,” Zelenskiy said, according to a text of the speech. “And this is especially true for air defense, military aid, and our overall resilience.”

    It’s crucial, why? What will it accomplish?

    Kallas has put forward a proposal for EU members to deliver as much as €40 billion in military aid this year, stepping up after €20 billion flowed to Kyiv in 2024. Assistance would be voluntary, but participants would be encouraged to make contributions in cash or equipment in proportion to their respective economies. After several countries balked, the debate was narrowed to focus this week on the ammunition component.

    Amazing. Every EU country is rushing to ramp up military spending by using the war as justification. Hundreds of millions of euros have been slashed from welfare budgets. And yet, they don’t want to spend any of this money in the country where the war is actually happening!



  • So far this isn’t anything like that period in German history.

    Seeing the rise of AfD and Germany’s agressive collaboration on the Israeli genocide, I have to respectfully say, liberals like you are willfully burying your heads in the sand.

    Poland has been doing more than its share for Europe defense

    Europe’s defense against who? Europe faces no actual military threats from anybody. And no, civilians in the imperial periphery or immigrants don’t count as military threats. For the last 3-4 centuries, the only nations who have been killing Europeans are other Europeans.

    Americans are more likely to invade Europe than help them in a conflict.

    Even Trump, who is trying to shake down Europe has actually continued/resumed aid to Ukraine. I can’t believe that Europeans are falling for a con from the world’s greasiest clown. He only postures so that you guys are scared into spending more money on NATO and American weapons.






  • For years, realist thinkers have been banished to academia or ignored. …

    Every single example of the “realists” in this paragraph have them being the ones telling politicians to avoid war and expansionism, the exact opposite of the “strong bullying the weak”! I think it is kind of insane how this is how “realism” is characterized in liberal media. And that too as a “strong bullying the weak” ideology! Liberals have unironically become full on bush-era Neo-cons.

    George Kennan argued against NATO expansion in these pages in 1997, predicting that it would inflame Russian militarism and undermine Russian democracy.

    Damn, I didn’t know people predicted the Ukraine war that far in advance.

    What’s brought about this turn? In part, it is insecurity, the motivation of all bullies.

    Day 1041 of me painfully begging people to stop psychoanalyzing their enemies.

    Even so, the United States and its allies are stronger than Team Russia and China if they stand together.

    I’m beginning to think that when this author decries “realism”, they think “realism” means “being in touch with reality”.

    While Mr. Trump embraces some elements of realism — giving in to the strong and sacrificing the weak — his tariff wars and threats against peaceful neighbors could end up being as costly as the military adventurism of the previous liberal order. Rajan Menon, a professor emeritus at the City College of New York, told me that people who expect the Trump administration “to follow the playbook of realism” by showing restraint “are going to get very disappointed.”

    Other than the continued use of nonsense categories like “strong” and “weak”, I actually agree with this paragraph.

    After Athens sacked Melos, word of its brutality spread. Its allies turned against it. Athens lost the war. Noble ideas, it turns out, do matter.

    I know nothing about the history of war but I would be surprised if this is how it actually played out.













  • the United States isn’t structured in a way where the President can go against the will of the Bourgeoisie.

    I think we are overestimating the amount of solidarity and power of the American bourgeoise, partly because that’s the image of strenght they love to project.

    The state always holds a dominant position wrt the bourgeoise. If tommorow trump wanted American billionaires merced, there isn’t much anyone could do to stop him.

    Yes the bourgeoise control american civil society and have some influence over various parts of the government, but trump is the commander of the armed forces and has a strong movement backing him.