I think Arts and Sciences folks need to team up and fuck up Commerce bros.
I think Arts and Sciences folks need to team up and fuck up Commerce bros.
Not available on f droid yet it seems
I think the aussie contestant is getting disproportionate amount of mockery (and even hate). It’s becoming borderline bullying
See, replication isn’t a problem if your entire field is vibes-based. A lot of economics papers I come across are like that (so much so that I am close to writing off the entire decipline as unscientific). The diff in the level of rigour you would see in e.g. particle physics versus in economics is baffling.
It used to be psychology as well but I am noticing they are more than aware of their replication crisis lately. Whereas economics feels pseudoscience with a maths clothing.
Black holes aren’t like magnets
Steve Jobs was no different from the rest in Silicon Valley who would spout virtues out loud while simultaneously undermining them in practice.
I finished it just there. First chapter and bits of later chapter are great, but unfortunately the rest of the book is poorly sourced. For a book with “science” in title, I was expecting more rigour.
Currently reading “The Science of Storytelling” by Will Storr, it is quite good so far!
Microsoft is magnitudes worse than google.
Obligatory fuck you microsoft
Elixir: Look of superiority
How do you define Tech bros? I lump them in Commerce category in my head.
Computer Science/Engineering people I have encountered are more into liberatory politics (whether they overtly acknowledge it/are awareof it or not)