I imagine that China’s security forces makes even Cuba’s look like boy scouts.

99 percent of the time, the only problem that liberals have with the Vietnam war was that the U.S. lost, not about the suffering and death of millions of innocent people, or the fact that the U.S. tried to overthrow Vietnamese democracy and socialism.

Numerous academics have stated that capitalism killed bare minimum 1.4 Billion people in India alone, over multiple centuries.

I’ve got a feeling that even that amount, is an extremely low bare minimum estimate.

I always say, that even if communism allegedly killed 100 million people, (which it didn’t, and the extreme upper end number is is more like 18 million), that communism is still the much, much more efficient, workable and “moral” system than capitalism is.

When I point out to people that for the most part, the “victims” of communism were selfish, greedy capitalists, kulaks, Uncle Toms, traitors, nazis and right-wing nationalists, who deserved what they got, where as capitalism kills mountains more people, and 99 percent innocent people, they accuse me of being a bootlicker. Which is extremely ironic and anger-inducing. Yet, they don’t deny the objective facts.

I’m sure you didn’t mean it in that way, I didn’t mean to make it sound like you were charitable to the organization as a whole, you’re good.

I think you’re being very charitable about the CIA’s claim. While the USSR was a dictatorship of the proletariat, I’m pretty sure the CIA meant dictatorship in the way most people use the term.

I’ve legit had capitalist bootlickers say that “The CIA didn’t conclude that Stalin wasn’t a dictator, just that he didn’t have absolute power!”

These stupid ass crakkkers completely miss the point, that of course the CIA will still slander Stalin, socialism, and the USSR. They’ll never say that Stalin was a cool, misunderstood heroic guy. The point is that even in internal, secret documents for CIA personnel, the fact remains even they admit that Stalin wasn’t a dictator.

I don’t think that most people realize that if anything, human nature is inherently selfless, even communistic, in the grand scheme of things.

“No, Kim Jong-Un executes them with his Jedi mind powers! How dare you ten-keeze deny that!”

I understand that. That is more like an excuse than a reason, though. Not saying you are saying it’s an excuse, and I’m not saying it doesn’t matter.

The better part of 8 years

If someone hands you a baseball bat and tells you to beat up Superman for $2 of gum, and he kicks the shit out of you, you have no one else to blame.

Ukrainian fascists bought into decades of imperialist and white supremacist propaganda and refused to take responsibility for their stupid-ass actions and their bootlicking of far-right Banderite reactionary scumbags.

Russia is unironically more caring about Ukrainian sovereignty than Zelenskyy and the fascist west are.

I can only barely put into words scratching the surface of the stupidity, evil, and short-sightedness of UkraNazi fascists, they drive me even more up the wall than ZioNazis do. ZioNazis are also slightly more honest and transparent about their aims.

Of course I and every single other reasonable person feel sorrow for the extreme amounts of depression, suffering, destruction, debt and death that this conflict brings, and I highly doubt that anyone thinks that Russia’s aims in this conflict are pure or driven purely by altruism, or that all Ukrainians are somehow evil or responsible for the actions of some rich scumbags.

But yeah, I think it’s more than fair to say that the country brought this on itself. The government allowed itself to be a fleshlight and a battering ram to “own the Russians” and now that their shit is getting kicked in and they are facing consequences, they throw a fucking fit over their own stupidity, evil and actions, like a petulant child. And petulant children are a quadrillion times more reasonable, empathetic and intelligent than the UkraNazis are.

I definitely agree that alot of Amerikkkan politicians and experts seem to be drinking the Koolaid and actually believing their own narcissistic, twisted, evil lies and delusions. I just hope/think that China will be more than enough of a match to stand up to, hack, destroy, shut down or whatever the fuck to nuclear weapons and launch sites, and put the imperialists in a choke-hold before they can retaliate.

I’ve read that China even has the technology to remotely detect and shut down nuclear missiles, or scramble, disable or short them out. Or at the very least, identify or shoot them before they are truly primed.

I’m not particularly worried about the U.S. firing nuclear weapons at China, but I’m not nonchalant about it, either.

That’s why I figure that China would be the safest place in the world if/when World War 3 or nuclear war breaks out.

I understand that nuclear weapons exist for the U.S. to use as a last resort to destroy the world to prevent the good guys from truly winning, in the end.

I don’t think that nuclear weapons are as big of a threat as the U.S. parades them around to be, or as comrades say they are.

I’m not saying the U.S. would never launch nuclear weapons, or that we should approach it with no caution, I just think it’s unlikely that the bourgeoisie would actually use them.

But people aren’t 100 percent rational, either.

I think you’re jumping the gun a bit. Russia has no real reason or drive to betray China.

If the U.S. forces a war with China, China would most likely easily when, especially before nukes are launched.

Illegal by it’s own law and processes. Can you not read?

The vast majority of citizens of the USSR and Soviet-aligned states favored keeping the country together/remaining part of it, aside from maybe Ukraine and 2 other polities.

You don’t get to override 70 percent of the USSR’s will and call it democracy.