• 0 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2020

help-circle








  • imo

    Main Points

    1. most people (including most men) do not actually give a fuck.

    2. a tiny insignificant group mumbling in a dark corner probably do care, but noone should give a shit or listen to them.

    3. instead their voice is amplified in social/legacy media as a typical divide and conquer tactic (men vs women is ‘powerful’ as its half the planet vs the other half).

    4. unoriginal drones parrot those amplifications because they’ll get angry about whatever their screens tell them to this week.

    5. society has leaned male-dominant for too long, so genuine efforts to be fair are perceived by some idiots (see #2,#4) as “unfair”.

    6. corporations don’t actually give a shit about equality, so their maliciously half-arsed pretense at fairness rings hollow, adding more fuel to the flames.

    Bonus

    If you want to know more about this problem in general, see the Bechdel test, once you see it, you can’t unsee it everywhere you go:

    The test asks whether a work features at least two female characters who have a conversation about something other than a man.




  • ganymede@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlNever blame the system
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Glad to see everyone agrees this is

    1. funny cos they’re crying over stealing what they stole

    2. acknowledges this means the weights are actually open sourced (which is how it fuckin should be)

    also discussion i’ve seen elsewhere:

    1. when considering the energy footprint of chatgpt, also consider the energy footprint of running the internet for 30 years to accumulate all that data they stole. therefore the most ecological option is to extract the weights and then opensource it.

    just want to add

    1. if the accusations aren’t true (still a possibility), oai is probably deliberately buying time/stock recovery by keeping this discussion in the news rather than everyone discussing how much they suck

    2. if large entities are going to capture and then open source each others proprietary weights, that may actually be one of the best outcomes for global humanity amidst this “AI” craze



  • obviously this is all just my opinion, but it seems evident to me:

    the oligarchs.

    they’ve realised their best shot at power is by dividing us cos there’s no way this shit would fly otherwise. that’s why they’ve been flooding us with every single possible topic of division, black vs white, straight vs lgbqt, even lgb vs trans (!!!), young vs old, boomers vs millenials. city vs rural.

    all of that said, if you just don’t think you can stomach the wedding event then you’re nta imo.



  • I wonder if the context of ‘tech person’ vs average person is what they meant?

    A genx tech person in their field is going to be on avg further along than millenial in the same field - because they’ve literally been doing it longer, more experience, learnt more, exposed to more fundamentals.

    imo the distinction is the average (non-tech) genx probably will have less tech exposure than avg millenial, millenials were coming up during the shift of the average person thinking “computers are for geeks” to “tech is cool”.

    disclaimer: generation names are kind of arbitrary divide and conquer bs anyway.