European Wasps are an invasive species where I live and they’re fucking up a lot of the local flora and fauna. Also “wasps” is a huge group of species and they’re hard to generalise about

What’s this? Actually considering the arguments presented and not dismissing them as antisemitic out of hand? Are western judicial systems allowed to do this?

As someone with a degree in Philosophy, I don’t think this is really a philosophical question. The science is interesting and useful to know

Okay. I live in New Zealand. How do we force the US to not fund Israel?

I don’t think it’s insincere at all. Most nations would like the US to not support Genocide but none of them have the power to force the US to do anything

I don’t think it’s naive. It’s the view of almost every nation in the world

The US also should not do that

He’s not wrong

Here in NZ most wasps are European Wasps which are an invasive species and are very destructive to the local ecosystem

Unlimited campaign finance

I have. I note several responses from people in the thread who have.

We need to eat. We don’t need tol take joy in aninal deaths. These are different things and the meme is dumb.

Well, no. Diogenes was a twat. Plato wasn’t expecting people to be idiots. His idea was that philosopher kings would have to live amongst the ordinary people of the state. They would be dependent on the good will of the governed.

The really important part missing from the cartoon is that the philosopher kings were not allowed to own anything and all the wealth was to sit with workers. The idea is that those making decisions shouldn’t be in a position to personally benefit from it. It’s not a terrible idea

I think Biden should go and the media is right to question his capacity but by God are they utterly blind to Trump’s myriad of failings. Biden in inadequate but he’s bloody Einstein next to Trump

It is, by definition, not inaction. However I agree that change is too slow.

It used to be SFA now it’s 30% number go up is positive

Which wasn’t what the article was claiming, hence your post being a strawman

Firstly the article does not say that 30% is sufficient. Secondly, this was always going to be a journey. We don’t get to near 100% without first going through 30%. The article wasn’t saying 30% is enough it was saying that the trajectory is positive.

“sufficient”. Where did you get THAT from?