Im sorry, I thought this was America.
Im sorry, I thought this was America.
Calling Al Jazeera „independent“ is quite a stretch. They are funded by Qatar, a authoritarian monarchy based on sharia law, where homosexuality is punishable by death, women’s testimony is worth half of that of men and they have fun punishments such as stoning and flogging.
That doesn’t mean YouTube is not suppressing media. In fact, in my experience the algorithm heavily favors right wing propaganda and has done so for years.
So maybe Al Jazeera has fallen out of favor. Or maybe they have themselves inflated their numbers previously with a method that no longer works, or they are just focusing their propaganda efforts on other, stupider platforms, like TikTok.
A bit of roundup and horse paste, the MAGA cure-all.
Ah yes, vitamins, the secret cure-all that has been kept from us all those years without brainworms at the helm.


I didn’t. Have been wondering about „what if“ ever since. So save yourself some grief and do it.


Have you checked your blood pressure?
That does not matter to the case. Its justice, so it must be done. What the media and the public make from it might be another thing entirely of course.
This has nothing to do with ssd or their size. Harddisks also have a little spare area (though not as big) and can mark and remap failing sectors.
RAID (1) is still (possibly) good for the only thing it ever was (possibly) good for: Keeping the system running long enough for you to put in a new harddisk if one fails.
Think of industrial systems where every minute of downtime can cost thousands of dollars. And even there the usefulness of RAID can be questioned: should you not in that case have a whole spare system, easy to swap in, because more than just storage can fail?
And what about the RAID controller itself? Does it not add complexity and another point of failure to the whole system?
And most importantly: will anyone actually get notified of a failing disk and replace it quickly? Or will the whole thing just prolong the inevitable?
Would you even trust a system that had one disk fail already to keep going in a critical place? Or would it not be safer to just replace the whole thing anyway after one failure?


Windows 7. no ads, no sudden candy crush, no cloud data stealing.
Making air quotes.
Bark?