Is it simple? It looks quite complicated, but maybe that’s just me forgetting how to compute forces.

Do I sit out on the nuclear ralley, hmmm

Mom, can I have applied category theory?

We have applied category theory at home.

Applied category theory at home: the meme

deleted by creator

Counting cohomology has done to me a numbers x_x

True nathematician would never make a mistake distinguishing finite and infinite cardinality. Countability, on the other hand… (but that’s a separate issue)

If only haskell devs were writing documentations, instead of going “type sigs is all the documentation you need!”

There is no good programming language, even including the ones people do not use.

I wish I were you, I struggle so much with reading books and papers

I thought this was taught in high school. Curriculums differ drastically between countries, don’t they?

Topology on steroids with K-valued logic, nice

I am not familiar with this, would you share what country you are talking about?

May I ask for an interesting archeological piece/story?

As a TA who barely did a class, so relatable

Infinitesimal approach is often more convoluted when you perform various operations, like exponentials.

Instead, epsilon-delta can be encapsulated as a ball business, then later to inverse image check for topology.

Seems like getting even more attention, potentially thanks to Shrödinger effects

Stokes theorem in disguise

Then there is “vector is one that transforms like vector”

Too technical of a meme

I would like to reply to ridicule with another ridicule: Women are immune to maths.