Opening the connections is one thing but resends and stream ordering can also cause issues since they might delay the latest information reaching the user space application even if the packet for them has actually arrived just because some earlier packet has not. There can also be issues with implementations waiting for enough data to be available before sending a packet.

Most low latency use cases in games use UDP, not TCP.

You could use https://netboot.xyz/ to boot a bunch of Live systems from various distros relatively quickly (depending on your download speed).

He probably didn’t read the Evil Overlord list.

The point was more if atuin breaks your shell under those circumstances so you can not fix the full disk. Sqlite usually writes some transaction file before it does anything, doesn’t it?

Does sqlite read-only access still work when the disk is full? Would be bad if your history tool prevented shell access when you need to delete something if your disk fills up. Also not sure how fsynced access might slow down debugging of I/O starvation issues (when you want your shell to run from memory mostly).

Yeah, but lets say I have two servers, one hosts matomo.foo.com and the other hosts matomo.bar.com and I want to update each of those for the second time (the commands are already in the history from last time), with sync I would have to pay much more attention to get the correct commands from the history when I recall the commands for upgrading the database in the correct vhost dir for each (some php matomo.php core:upgrade or similar invocation using a script in the vhost dir), especially when it is mixed in with commands from 50 other servers.

Or lets say I run some dangerous command on the dev server (DROP DATABASE), without sync I can never accidentally use it from the history on the live server.

Syncing shell history between machines seems like an incredibly bad idea considering how many commands are specific to one host and not having all the commands from other hosts in the history makes it so much easier to find them again in the history. Maybe I am thinking about this too much from a cross-platform and server viewpoint though.

Smaller projects are more risky. This is true for proprietary software also - generally,

Not necessarily. Large commercial vendors might be much more likely to kill off one of many projects, even large ones, than a small vendor is to kill off their only project.

add the ability to control who is able to subscribe

This seems tricky to enforce on a per-user basis since content federated to another instance for one user could easily be shared with another user on that instance without the original instance ever knowing about that.

And someone can fork the codebase if the original author or current maintainer refuses to fix major issues. Closed source software vendors refuse to do so quite frequently.

I am not sure this will work as intended since part of the problem is that most of the lurkers who read the original and never interacted with it beyond that have already moved on to something entirely different by the time any mistake admitting, forgiveness,… happens.

In general, never go for the cheap option on anything where flaws have the potential to destroy something much more valuable (either more expensive or your health, life,…).

Israel isn’t a colony, it was one. And that doesn’t mean that everything Israel does is directed by “colonial powers” or that it is one itself.

You think America is getting nothing out of all those guns it sends to Israel?

That is more or less just support for the weapons industry in the US itself. But they are sending them to Israel in particular because Israel does things for them in the region. Those things that America has a vested interest in do not include the Gaza strip, the US couldn’t care less what a bunch of poor people do in a region without strategic resources. Anything the US does related to the Gaza strip are things they do for Israel in exchange for other things Israel does for them.

That is the US acting on behalf of Israel, not the other way around.

Where are or were their colonies?

On other matters, certainly. But on the Gaza strip specifically?

Part of stepping into Jewish anti-Zionism is accepting the fact that our religion has been hijacked by fascists who commit ongoing genocide on behalf of colonial powers.

In what way is this “on behalf of colonial powers”? From what I can tell Israel is acting for their own benefit. Nobody outside of Israel (as in governments) has a vested interest in the question of who lives in the Gaza strip.

You can assign a word to use in front of your search to pick a search engine in Firefox and that has worked for years.