• heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They need to get the fuck rid of that executive. Whoever has been running FF the last couple years has done a terrible job in picking directions for them to go, IMHO.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What the fuck would a non profit need to pull google level profits for?

        Mozilla should have been a gatekeeper for open web standards and made a browser that catered exactly to that. The rest is window-dressing.

        What did they do with the Google money, tho? Eye-watering packages for their MBA/Lawyer executives and compromise after compromise with DRM peddlers in the name of “market cap”.

        Fuck em, and let it be a lesson for other non-profits. FSF doesn’t seem to be any worse off for not paying cOmPetiTiVe rAtEs to get some clueless execs to betray the mission to chase trends and funds.

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t see how being a non-profit suddenly makes it cheaper to build a secure, modern and compatible browser. (Although I know lots of people underestimate how much effort that takes. But just consider that already Mozilla’s doing it for far less money than Google invests in Chrome, for example.)

          • qweertz (they/she)@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Running a community-centred nonprofit is inherently more efficient resources-wise than paying managers and execs piles upon piles of cash in a for-profit scheme