fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agoCursedmander.xyzimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1386arrow-down15
arrow-up1381arrow-down1imageCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 days agoIs this a hard limit we’ve proven or can we still keep trying?
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·4 days agoWe actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 days agoFiguring out 1-4 must have been sooo tough
Is this a hard limit we’ve proven or can we still keep trying?
We actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
Figuring out 1-4 must have been sooo tough