• x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Isn’t it odd that researchers who should be pros at caring about and finding the most correct metrics for every topic are obsessed with a proxy for quality that is just about the most disjoint possible? It should be embarrassing.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Dunno what Sci-Hub is, but most researchers are happy to send you a copy of their paper on request - and this is completely legal. Their email address is usually on the abstract.

        • Shelena@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I am a scientist and you are right. If I get a message asking for my work, I will send it. It will also make me happy that someone is interested. It happens regularly, usually via researchgate.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not owning it can get them in trouble for sharing

        It depends on the publishing agreement

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Adding up to days in the best scenarios to any research study when scihub or arxiv cuts it down to seconds. Because no one cares about time.

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    If scientists didn’t have to pay obscene prices to view articles, those articles are cited more often. Who would have thought?

  • Mavvik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I personally like scihub because it’s easier to get papers off of rather than going through my library’s portal for a lot of journals.

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know if it’s just my field or if I’m searching wrong, but I get almost nothing when I look for papers about German grammar and language instruction. Is this mostly for more mainstream/hard science papers?

    • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My input: I’ve never searched for papers in Scihub directly. I usually find them off Google scholar or something, and then put the paywalled URL or the DOI (an identifier you can usually find in the paywalled website) in Scihub to go to that paper. I don’t think search capabilities are in scihub’s scope.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I generally use the DOI, but I did not realize that you could just type in a paywalled url. That might explain it, thanks!

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Idk if itll help but have you tried annas archive? It mirrors multiple science piracy sites.

      Edit:do you mean pedagogical materials or research? Cause I don’t think you’ll be lucky if it’s the former.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have tried it, but also not had any luck. I am looking for research, but it’s still a really narrow field, tbh. Even in Germany, I think there are only a handful of DaF/aZ postgrad programs.

        • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          So yeah it’s probably your field! Sorry about that. Fwiw I don’t think the problem is that it isn’t ‘hard science’, I find it easy to find philosophical works (German, English and French language ones). It’s probably just too niche.