___

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    This all true, but wood still burned. You think forest fires are bad now? Imagine several centuries of dry timber stacked up waiting for a lightning strike.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Coal is this, except it’s largely fronds, which the trees shed three same way modern ones shed leaves. IIRC the trees were related to ferns. Before that there were big fungus pillars that served as trees.

  • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hypothetically, if we were alive during that time period. We would have microwood in our balls and not microplastic?

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If we were alive back then, either we took those bacteria with us, or we would cease being alive fairly quickly; I don’t think our intestines work without them anymore

      • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hypothetically, if were absent of contaminating the environment by not having that bacteria and instead used nano technology to break down food.

        Would we still have microwood in our balls?

  • stelelor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unlike trees, plastic is not self-renewing. So when humanity goes extinct, there will no longer be a steady supply of plastic for these microbes. They will crash just as quickly (geologically speaking) as they arose.