• daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    22 days ago

    I moved to Chicago a few years. I go to rent an apartment. It has a “move-in” fee.

    I’m like what’s that.

    Oh it’s $500 that you don’t get back.

    I say. What about the deposit? They say. Oh yeah we don’t require that. Isn’t that great ,?

    I’m like. So move in fee is my deposit but it’s just guaranteed I won’t get it back.

    Them: well it’s different. It’s a move in fee. We don’t require a deposit but if you don’t clean out the apartment to this list of specifications, we will charge you per item you miss.

    Example. Refrigerator not cleaned :$150 Floors not clean : $200

    Etc.

    So I was super unhappy about this and complained to anyone who would listen. To which my new Chicago neighbors and friends were like “that’s how it’s always been here,”

    Bro. Y’all getting fucked. Hard. Non refundable deposit where you still have to clean out the old apartment.

    Wtf. Should be illegal.

  • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    The real estate market. In many countries, the value of labor and materials necessary to build a house is about 30 to 40 40 to 120 thousand euros. Everything else is speculation.

    Edit. Initially I put 30 to 40 thousand euros.

  • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    22 days ago

    Passive income. If value is being created and you’re being presented some of it without doing any work it necessarily means that someone else isn’t receiving the full value of the work they’re doing.

    • Owen Earl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      In most cases I agree with you, but what about a musician who makes passive income off of people streaming their music, or people who buy my fonts?

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        21 days ago

        Cap it at the original 28 years after creation. The current 70 years after the creator’s death is ridiculous.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Even 15 years is a lot of money for something you most likely spent under 6 months creating. Of course, we could always have a detailed system and not just one flat time frame.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            I think people overestimate how much the average creator can get from their work over time. They need to keep creating to maintain a livable income. Also, 28 years is a good number because it prevents mega corporations from stealing from small creators. Imagine if some novel series becomes a big hit, but Disney or Warner Brothers could just adapt it whenever they pleased without paying the author.

        • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Even if the assets aren’t people, not squeezing value is required to maintain some fun and life as well as long term sustainability. If you squeeze it, you might squeeze it dry. I hate all the adverts everywhere. Can I just go somewhere to save my eyes…

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    22 days ago

    college textbooks. have to have the latest edition for class, but almost nothing is different from the two-years-old one.

    • dom@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      And recycling most plastics. End up in a landfill because its cheaper than actually recycling them.

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      This. I have opinions on waste management, please indulge a little rant, if you will?

      In my city they also now have us pay for the privilege of dumping residual waste. It’s worth noting that residual residential waste is stuffed into a silo - the users bring it to a collection point, and open it with an RFID key card. You’re sent a bill for each time this is opened.

      It’s also worth noting that the plastic bin, if it looks like they can’t sort it, they will toss it in general waste.

      These factors combine into a situation where:

      • Tossing things in the recycling bin has it end up in gen waste anyway
      • It’s cheaper for the end user to dump their residual waste inappropriately, either by stuffing it into recycling despite not going there, or by dumping it in the bushes somewhere

      Imo, fixes would include the following:

      • At the very least, using the general waste silo should not come with extra costs
      • Recyclables and residual waste should be merged into a single waste flow, which is to be recycled in general.
      • We should make work of actual plastic recycling at a commercial scale.
    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      Ive always thought it was due tax related reasons. In México, most shops have it set up so the price + IVA (our consumer tax) gives you a rounded number.

    • 1D10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      I honestly don’t understand that, I have always rounded up for money going out and down for money coming in. So if I see something priced at $3.25 my brain thinks $4, and if I earn $3.25 my brain thinks $3 dollars.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    22 days ago

    Everything about cars from manufacturing, sales, insurance, repair, registration and taxes. We could just have Public transportation.

    • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      The car is a tool to move yourself and your family/friends from place A to place B. But James Bond, Batman, rap videos made a status symbol of it. They created a modern mythology around it.

      The transformation of the automobile from a means of transport into a luminous totem of status is a near-perfect case study of what Pierre Bourdieu theorised as the conversion and misrecognition of capital.

      Bourdieu argued that capital presents itself in three fundamental guises: economic capital (money, assets), cultural capital (knowledge, taste, credentials), and social capital (networks, group membership). These are not static silos; they are constantly converted into one another to legitimise and reproduce social hierarchies. The car, in its purest state, is merely objectified economic capital, a purchased good with a clear use-value: to move from A to B. But the moment it enters the cultural field, it is inscribed with meaning, and it becomes a vehicle for symbolic capital, which Bourdieu defined as the form the other capitals take when they are perceived and recognised as legitimate.

      https://archive.org/stream/bourdieu-the-forms-of-capital-1/Bourdieu The Forms of Capital-1_djvu.txt

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    22 days ago

    Paying for education that “the market” wants us to have so they can have a larger pool of skilled workers, leading to lower salaries