Have you met any actual radfems? And no, TERFs don’t count. Most of the people using that label or having it applied to them aren’t even feminists in the first place, much less radical ones. Rowling and her ilk aren’t TERFs. Actual TERFs fly under the radar as TERFs because they don’t constantly talk about trans people. I’ve had to distance myself from many radfems who seemed genuinely normal before revealing how transphobic they were when it came to trans issues because of this, and even then they are outnumbered by trans-inclusive radfems - many of whom are themselves trans, much like myself.
“Kill all men” is a misogynistic, anti-feminist stereotype. It is used to smear feminists and especially radfems. The man-hating feminist caricature exists to demonize feminism and its supporters and doesn’t reflect a statistically significant trend within feminism but is based on deliberate misframing of radical feminist theory.
Literally nothing you just said is true.
Have you met any actual radfems? And no, TERFs don’t count. Most of the people using that label or having it applied to them aren’t even feminists in the first place, much less radical ones. Rowling and her ilk aren’t TERFs. Actual TERFs fly under the radar as TERFs because they don’t constantly talk about trans people. I’ve had to distance myself from many radfems who seemed genuinely normal before revealing how transphobic they were when it came to trans issues because of this, and even then they are outnumbered by trans-inclusive radfems - many of whom are themselves trans, much like myself.
“Kill all men” is a misogynistic, anti-feminist stereotype. It is used to smear feminists and especially radfems. The man-hating feminist caricature exists to demonize feminism and its supporters and doesn’t reflect a statistically significant trend within feminism but is based on deliberate misframing of radical feminist theory.