• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Somebody call the Wahhhmbulance. This guy is outmoded. How about expanded security permissions for small groups of people in a larger directory? How about PAM auth plugins? How about escalation preventiontion for those same people, PLUS auditing instead of just seeing “root did something dumb”.

    I don’t even get why this gent even bothered to wine and complain about this except that he doesn’t “get it”. This has been a solved issue for over 20 years now, and you don’t see large swathes of folks bitching and moaning about sudo at all.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you need to provide tools that cross security boundaries then […] a small web app is better [than sudo].

      A web app? Effin really!!? 🤨

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like an important thing he forgot to mention though is that it lets you allow multiple users to have root privileges without having to share passwords or SSH keys

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed useful to not having to share passwords. I think sudo historically started as a way to let some users in a company for example manage printer server settings without having a root password. (And I believe it was Ubuntu in 2004 which promoted sudo and forced the default user after an installation to use sudo to perform root commands).