• ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Calling it a lump of fat is a bit like calling the Milky Way a very sparse field of hydrogen

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Depends on what you mean by ‘consciousness’. If you mean the actual biological process that is happening in our brains - yes. If you mean something different, it is probably not a scientific meaning but more a philosophical or religious one, which is ultimately not a bad thing but you should separate this from actual science.

  • Masta_Chief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    This gets explored a bit in The Talos Principle and it’s sequal. Working on the 2nd one now, it’s been fun

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    “The material, sensuously perceptible world to which we ourselves belong is the only reality… Our consciousness and thinking, however supra-sensuous they may seem, are the product of a material, bodily organ, the brain. Matter is not a product of mind, but mind itself is merely the highest product of matter.” — Karl Marx

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If by consciousness, you just mean thinking, then sure.

    But if you mean awareness — “phenomena”, if you prefer — then I don’t see why an experiential state would (or could) be entirely secondary to a physical state.

    It is, after all, possible for me to write words and perform other physical actions based on my experiential state. In many ways, my mental world is more “real” than the physical world.

    For what it’s worth, I don’t think rejecting physicalism necessarily requires embracing the idea of a soul. I’m an atheist, and a neutral monist, for example. But if I had to choose between only physicalism and idealism, idealism makes more sense. Before anything else, I’m conscious.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Action potential doesn’t do thinking. Thinking happens at neuron junctions and that shits chemical and analogue. The electrical part just moves the data to the next synapse. There are some gap junctions but those aren’t really associated with thinking.