• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not to be a capitalist pig but even under capitalism in the USA that is just fraud.

    • teagrrl@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most people have no ability or funds for recourse and justice. It’s just going to be a SOL moment.

      • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        My friend has a slumlord next to him doing this, he’s charging $250 per application and rejecting everyone. So my friend is renting his spare room to his last tenant and thinking about suing. Fucks up the neighborhood.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I did 97 meth deals ($45 each).

    That’s $4365 in passive income.

    I don’t even have any meth and just gave them sugar crystals.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They’re free to choose to pay or not to pay. You don’t have rental application fees so you don’t have a choice. Your freedom is curtailed!

  • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lmaooo Dudes, US people have no business making fun of communist if they do things like this. What do you mean you pay for an application for rent a space to living for???

  • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Virtue signaling is a very interesting primate trait. From lying about where you were last night to wearing clothing in the first place, manipulating your status is uniquely human. If dolphins or octopuses made a civilization, this would be unlikely to emerge.

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ever seen Orcas wearing salmon hats?

      Hierarchical systems are perfectly normal in social systems. Not in the rigid way your manosphere nutters use it, but it’s still a thing!

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, there’s a philosophical point that’s worthy of exploring.

          Is human activity, including manipulation, a result of nature or in conflict with it?

          • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Biology is so neat! I love animals. You should check out the velvet worm and social structures. Just fascinating that complex (and evidence suggests even more complex) social behavior arises from a ridiculously different neutral structure and evolutionary lineage. As for philosophy, may I point you to egalitarianism as the ultimate balance with the fact that mitochondria symbiosis may have started with predation. The host cell failed to digest it (maybe), and mitochondria, like your gut biome, was like, “yeah, this is chill, too.”

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why would anyone want Mao to wake up? The fuck kind of genocide denialism is this?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mao is very popular in the PRC, and among Marxists. The modern CPC recognizes his contributions as around 70% good, 30% bad. The Cultural Revolution in particular is a touchy subject largely seen as a misstep, but certainly not a “genocide” either. Same with famine, which was previously common in China but was only ended by the communists in power.

      Mao’s popularity stems from establishing socialism in China, successfully kicking out the Japanese imperialists and then winning the civil war against the nationalist Kuomintang, and building up a robust system of socialism in early China, accomplishing metrics like a doubling in life expectancy, large (but unstable, as Deng would later stabilize with socialist market reforms) economic growth, banning footbinding, and more.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not everything bad about China is CIA propaganda. They have a long way to go, economically and socially. At the same time, there’s factually a large anti-PRC budget for US propaganda, largely stemming from the large amount of friction faced when dealing with a socialist country in the world capitalist market. It’s accelerated because the PRC is currently surpassing the US in many key metrics, and is charted to do so in other areas in the coming years.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, when I said “every” I didn’t mean that literally. But at least 3-4 of the bigger ones. Which is a lot. Especially since I’ve talked to actual Chinese people that live in China that are less delusional. But you do you.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            The bigger ones literally are lmao. That’s why they’re the big ones, they’ve had a huge outpouring of resources to make them so. “Tiananment square” is a well documented psyop and so is the so called Uyghur genocide propped up almost exclusively on Adrian nonZenz

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve also talked to actual Chinese people that live in China, too. The Marxists are more correct about China than the liberals, by quite a laughably large margin.

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, but that’s because the liberals that you’re talking about are only liberals in name only and they think that China is some autocratic hellscape. It’s easy to be closer to the truth than those people. Also you’re both wrong. As is almost always the case, the truth is somewhere in the middle. But we’re on .ml, so ofc people will disagree with me on that

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not everything bad about China is CIA propaganda. They have a long way to go, economically and socially. At the same time, there’s factually a large anti-PRC budget for US propaganda, largely stemming from the large amount of friction faced when dealing with a socialist country in the world capitalist market. It’s accelerated because the PRC is currently surpassing the US in many key metrics, and is charted to do so in other areas in the coming years.

                Which part of this do you disagree with? You’re being a contrarion at this point, I outright stated that not everything bad about China is a lie, just that a huge portion of it is. You just stated that “the truth is in the middle,” but what I stated above already acknowledges that while good overall, China has a long way to go socially and economically. In fact, the fact that they largely succeed in their planning and are continuously improving both shows how far they have come and how far they have to go.

                People are disagreeing with you moreso because you’re just picking fights and playing the contrarion.

                • nyctre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I’m not picking “fights”, lol. I haven’t replied to a .ml thread in months. And I’m not getting into that because I have before and almost none of you have budged an inch.

                  Not on Tiananmen Square(yeah, it didn’t happen in the actual square, doesn’t mean nothing happened),

                  not on the Uyghur situation(just because they’re not getting genocided like the gazans doesn’t mean “education camps” is a socially acceptable thing to put someone through),

                  not on the fact that the metrics that you’re using to compare don’t paint the full picture(such as the whole green energy thing when in reality they’re still one of the highest CO2 emitting countries per capita)

                  nor on fact that you keep pretending that state capitalism = socialism, which is not. Just because a place is better than the USA doesn’t mean that it’s a good place.

                  Socially, yeah… Even worse xD I agree, they have tons of work ahead of them. And on certain issues (such as LGBTQ), they’re not really progressing.

                  Okay, so I felt I needed to reply to that for some reason. But like I said, I’ve talked about these things before, with you included, and you’ve never budged, so I’m not getting back into it. So unless you need to reply for someone else, don’t bother replying to me cause I’m not gonna respond anymore.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Meanwhile .world thinks that literally everything the US says about China is undeniable truth