This was bound to happen, and it’s ridiculous

  • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    11 days ago

    Josh Lane was addicted to porn by 14-years-old after first finding it via a Google search when he was aged 12.

    Now 25 and happily married.

    Wow. Porn really destroyed this mans life. What a tragic tale.

    • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 days ago

      If jacking off constantly at age 14 doomed a person we would never have left the Miocene epoch.

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Tho not so prevelant in this current timeline with internet access, there is a global phenomenon that most little boys can attest to. When we were growing up, there was forest porn. No one knew how it got there. No one claimed it. But in every town, county, village, city, et al, there were some woods with forest porn.

        I do not condone children viewing porn because they are not mentally or emotionally ready for that. However, I do know it exists and gosh, it seems to me that some proper parenting skills would solve a lot of problems.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Forest porn was absolute roided out boomer oriented garbage. Worst slop you’ve seen a billion times.

          On the other hand, the early videos with the old Lady teaching 13yr old me how to eat someone out and anatomy were better sex ed than school and “the talk”(didn’t happen lol) combined.

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 days ago

      He told Newsnight the addiction caused him to isolate himself from friends and family because he was “afraid of anyone discovering that I was hooked.”

      Mr Lane described finding “the only place I could get, I guess, love and intimacy was from pornography” at the same time as feeling “heaps of guilt and shame”

      The problem seems to have more to do with lack of proper sex education and social pressure rather than pornography. Why did he have to feel so ashamed that he isolated himself? That’s a real issue here!

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s not like it can’t happen, i also found porn very early on. I got addicted and it ruined my early sex life. Real women weren’t “exciting” anymore and I’d lost my sensitivity as well.

      This is NOT the solution but it’s also not not an issue

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Thank you for speaking up. I’m going to share a bit of my experience (unrelated to you, OP.)

        I suspect (from my experience dating men) that the desensitivity issue is more common than most people will admit. Few men want to admit that their dick doesn’t work properly, and a subset of those men will attempt to frame this problem as a benefit instead (“I can keep going for so long without cumming, it’s my super power!”) I don’t expect most men will talk with each other like this, but it’s one of the justifications such men tell their partners.

        From the partner’s perspective, I hate to have to say this, but… no, it’s not a power. It’s a weakness. A desensitized dick turns sex into a frustrating act that only ends when I get physically sore. If he doesn’t have that “natural stopping point” that usually signals an end to penetration, and the act still feels good to him - he doesn’t want to stop, so why would he? But it’s a very different experience from the “receiving” partner’s perspective. Most people who “receive” in sex don’t want to keep going until they end up in pain. We don’t want to always be the buzz-kill whose role is to decide, “Okay, sex time is over!” I want to have fun, too; not be the playground monitor that has to announce when recess is finished. Going on and on is a porn fantasy, and just like many porn fantasies, it’s not that fun in real life.

        The issue of porn-induced desensitivity is absolutely real. However, taking away people’s privacy online is not the solution. These laws are absolutely absurd and a terrifying glimpse of the future the fascists in power are aiming toward. (And for anyone overly-concerned about my sex life that feels the need to chime in with advice - I learned from the lessons of my past, and I share those lessons in hopes that others can learn from it too.)

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      Naturally is a problem of the parents and of nobody else, but the childrens are only an excuse of legislators to impose control, the only reason. If not the children than are crimes or terrorism to justify surveillance. More fascist an gov, more censorship, more biased information and less privacy is supported, it’s an axiom, the best citizen is an ignorant and submissive one. “First they banned childs from porn sites, than they banned anonym access to Wikipedia and VPN…” recipe how to cook a frog

      https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO02/20220407/114616/HHRG-117-GO02-20220407-SD018.pdf

      Repeating history by the same assholes to kill the free and open internet and information.

  • Guitarfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m so fucking sick of losing my rights to protect other people’s kids. I don’t have any fucking kids. Why don’t they apply their idiotic rules to those that do and leave the rest of us be.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Because it’s all an excuse to eliminate all privacy. The empire doesn’t survive if the workers are allowed to communicate freely.

      • Guitarfun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I know. If they really cared about protecting kids they could force ISPs to sell a whitelisted or blacklisted “Family” service. They could even go further into insanity and force parents to only use that service until their kids turn 18. They could even force parents to install tracking software to make sure kids only connect to safe networks and use school registration records to keep track of homes with children.

        Of course that’s all rediculous, but obviously they don’t want to protect kids. They want to take away our rights and privacy and with the way politicians all over the world have been harping about falling birthrates, making it harder to access porn might cause fewer people to use it in the hope that more people have kids.

    • The Menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      It is not about the children, nor their parents. Redirect your anger towards the perpetrators, not towards the scapegoats…

      • Guitarfun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I have no anger towards children or parents in general. I just think it’s the parent’s responsibility to monitor their kids not the government’s. Thus, the only people who should be affected by rediculous rules and laws that “protect children” are people who have children. Plus, there are plenty and religious and right wing parents who support shit like this.

    • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      Keep watching this bit, so you dont focus on the other bit… which will be to attack end to end encryption in message apps. ie you must put a back door in, so we can see who is saying what, whenever we want.

      This labour government, makes me want tories back. Thats how fucking bad they are.

      • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        you know, a federal europe with a shared, rotated heads of governments (always at least 3 countries) would help a lot, geopolitically too come back you fools, we miss you. Put Starmer and Farage together into a padded cell and let them fight it out

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’m a parent and I’m sick of it too. It’s so incredibly easy to monitor your kid today as modern parental control system literally do most of the work for you. Also you can just talk and be honest with your kids - 12-16 year olds are pretty smart contrary to what some want you to think.

      Literally no one likes this except the bottom of the barrel brain washed idiots. I’m not a conspiracist but I meet other parents and while I’m not based in the UK, porn access was never an issue for any parent so this just reeks of propaganda.

      • Guitarfun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Seriously, they build parental controls into pretty much all modern devices and there’s plenty of 3rd party software for added functionality and customization. The tools are there for parents. All they have to do is enable and configure them.

        I think people who support this shit and other other laws that strip our rights away are virtue signaling, neglectful/lazy, or like you said completely brainwashed. I think that those in power want to slowly work towards banning porn completely and not just in the UK. I’ve said it elsewhere, but politicians and rich assholes like Elon Musk are worried about birthrates falling and this is just one of many tactics to try to get people to have more kids.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          The 3rd party apps cost max 100$ a year and does almost everything for you (with plenty of good free 1st party options like Google Family Link). All you have to do is review the alerts and configure screen time and you still let your kids retain good amount of privacy. It’s insane how easy it is these days so there are no excuses for any parent, period.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 days ago

    I guess it’s just too late for all those children that viewed porn. The piles of their dead bodies must be enormous!

  • irmadlad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’ve been biting my tongue hard these past few months in a concerted effort not to be offensive. I’m not trying to be intentionally offensive, however, I feel there is an element in this situation that is being disregarded in favor of someone else doing your work. When I say ‘You’, Your’, etc, I mean it in the royal sense. So, warm up the downvote finger and man the flame throwers.

    If it’s genuinely for the children, then when are we going to require parents to be parents? Look, you brought this service into your home voluntarily. You might say ‘Well I need it for work’ or ‘I need it for school’. Tons of people use hundreds of thousands of hotspots daily to do their thing on the internet. This service you voluntarily brought into your house, has both the ability to be highly beneficial and highly detrimental all in the same breath. Technology always, always, always wields a double edged sword.

    And what do the majority of parents do with such power? They give it to their vulnerable, under aged, highly curious, children, un-monitored, uncensored, and uninhibited. Are you insane? So when little Johnny is caught surfing porn hub, the parents freak and cry out to their government ‘We need to ban porn!’ No! What we need is for parents to be parents.

    There are literally hundreds of services, and ways to lock down your internet. I hear parents say ‘I’m not technologically inclined.’ Get there. The safety and well being of your children hang in the balance. Take a class at your local Tech College. I’d be willing to bet that when little Johnny’s mom was pregnant, she most likely did some reading on the topic. Some even take a class on childbirth. The internet should be no different. Access one or two of the billions of tuts out on the internet.

    Now, will locking down your internet like a multi-billion dollar enterprise with a Brinks Kit keep little Johnny from seeing some skin? No! Why? Because it’s natural for humans to want to see what other humans look like naked. Children are naturally inquisitive. The prime directive of all life is to replicate. So, have frank, open, direct, and yes, awkward conversations with your children. Let them know in no uncertain terms what is acceptable on your network. Tell them why these things are not appropriate for their age group. This relationship with your children starts at Day 1.

    You have 18 years of boot camp to equip your children with all the tools necessary to make wise, prudent decisions in life. You probably taught them how to ride a bicycle, or drive a car, or any number of teaching opportunities parents have with their children. The internet should be no different. We live in a technological time line that is ever changing, so it behooves parents to know exactly what is going on with their technology and how their children are using it. Get with it.

    Being a parent takes work. Being a network administrator also takes work. Anyone who is a seasoned veteran of this chan knows, to secure a network in order to be as private, secure, and anonymous as possible on the internet, takes work. I find, a large portion of parents are unwilling to do the work and would rather fob off their responsibilities as a parent, to the government having jurisdiction. I’m not painting all parents with this brush. Kudos to parents who are very involved in their children’s lives. There are enough of them tho, that are not, and this is a big issue. It gives governments the justification they desire to surveil their citizenry.

    Let the roast begin.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’m not totally fine but I’m not not fine either, and I would say it’s kind of because the internet but it’s also not because the internet.

          Either way, mom and dad would have had no chance of stopping me unless they turned the house into 1984 in 1996, which would have been way worse than anything the internet did to me (except for all the shit we’re living through of course !)

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Can’t tell if serious. I am older than the internet. I’m not sure what that has to do with the issues of governmental surveillance under the guise of ‘for the chirren.’

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      So, warm up the downvote finger and man the flame throwers.

      cracks knuckles, pulls out pitchfork and flamethrower

      reads full comment

      Goddamnit… they’re right…

      throws toys out the pram

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    ministers told

    By a bunch of religious assholes that want more power

    By a bunch of corporate assholes that want more money

    By a bunch of politician assholes that want more power

    Did I forget anyone? Nobody wants this, none of this has to do with child safety, it’s all transparent lies to get more for them and less for us. Let’s break the entire internet so that a very small group has more

    Fuck all of you assholes, o hope you all die soon, the world would be souch better and nicer.

  • commit_aarson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    This pisses me off so much. They don’t give a single solitary fuck about kids OR their safety online. If they did, they wouldn’t do it like this. If/when I have kids, they’re not getting a smartphone until they turn 14. Until then, they’ll be using a flip phone to contact me. THAT’S how you create a safe online environment for kids, not by banning VPNs which takes away privacy rights from everyone else. They just want to control us and take our right to privacy away but they don’t realize that a strict government creates the best liars. If they ban VPNs, people WILL find a way to consume whatever content they desire regardless of what the government says. This can only end badly and make life hell for everyone below a certain tax bracket. Although, I guess that was their goal at the very beginning so I’m just being redundant.

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        No the next thing will be to ban porn completely. Look at Project 2025. It’s in the list. Granted this is a US based initiative but other countries seem to be speed running the checklist.

        The document’s foreword asserts that pornography is not protected by the First Amendment and “should be outlawed,” calling for criminal prosecution of producers and distributors and shuttering tech/telecom companies that facilitate its spread

          • commit_aarson@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            When you have a shit-ton of money and a system rigged in your favor, anything’s possible. Hell, for example, if they found a way to ban sexual acts and procreation (what we’ve been doing since the beginning of our species) whatsoever and restrict it to selected individuals that THEY choose, they’d change the laws to suit them, begin the brainwashing of their supporters under the guise of “the greater good,” and then they’d do it and everyone that voted for it would act surprised like any of what happened wasn’t foretold years prior.

      • commit_aarson@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if they did tbh. The ones at the top get what they want and if they see flash drives as a threat, they’ll try to ban 'em.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    The theme throughout my entire life is more and more control. I can’t even go from point A to point B in my city without being recorded every step of the way.

    Starting to look like a Big Brother future.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      The thing that annoys me the most about it (well, aside from the massive invasion of civil liberties and general dystopian behaviour) is that we don’t even get any of the fringe benefits of it. By that I mean, if I contact the government because I need some information about myself (recent examples: vaccine history, polling information, National Insurance query etc.) they act as if they’ve never been contacted by a person before and seem to immediately go into a panic and send you in a big loop of Other People Who Might Have It, with the end goal seeming to be “nobody knows where it is, let’s just hope they give up and stop asking.”

      Like if the government must insist on tracking every single thing I do and say and look at and place I go to, the least they could do is actually have that info to hand so I can use it too. It seems the more they track us, the less capable they are of actually doing anything useful with that information.

  • Hauntology95@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    A friend recently told me that palantir has some sort of stake in this data management for the OSA? Is this true? I know they’ve had a deal with NHS England for a few years

    If so, our world is taking a very scary turn

    If anyone hasn’t I’d advise to do research on palantir, Peter thiel and Curtis Yarvin for a window into the psychology of the people pushing us down this road

    Here’s a great video on the subject

  • icelimit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    I have a great job lined up in the UK, I’m not sure I can take it up considering that is turning into this kind of shit hole.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I agree, using saas services is a curse.

      If you don’t self host your goon llm she’s a prostitute

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    Even if kids see porn the lessons they learn are directly a result of how their parents approach the topic with them. Public education can’t functionally provide useful sex ed due to politics.

    I guess if you can blame your kids for breaking the law you never have to have “the talk” with them.

  • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    Same religious garbage they’ve been trying to pull for the last 75+ years.

    “Someone think of the CHILDREN!!!”.

    They scream, as they take away your rights to information, privacy, and anything else that they possibly can. They don’t want you to have rights.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m getting to the point where I’d rather see csam legalized than this shit. (Keep reading)

    Think about it: csam will happen, period. I’m not world’s best computer engineer but even Incan build something that embeds data like text or images in other files in ways that cannot be detected. I can build basic but effective encryption that will be hard enough to crack. I can find ways to exchange files outside the internet, hell, do sneakernet

    And kids watching porn online? They’ll have their buddies who have libraries that will be copied. A single USB drive can contain days of porn videos and you can’t stop that either

    Then there are these laws that “are to protect children” which makes me just outright want to vomit. You take victims of child pornography and use them for your political gain, for your power. You are almost worse than pedophiles. At least pedophiles harm only one child, you harm all of them you sack of fucking shit.

    And no, of course I don’t want child pornography legalized, of course not by what is the solution?

    These assholes have been at it for decades now and they play the long game. They can lose every year and come back next year. They only have to win once and they move on to he next good thing they can destroy.

    So what can we actually really seriously do to stop this?

    • The Menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      We had hardcore magazines that circulated back in the days before easy internet. Guess the last time children didn’t have access was probably in the 18th century or so.

      Guess the next step is controlling all chat groups, emails and cloud spaces to “avoid children exploiting these”…