A court ordered Google to pay $425 million after finding the company misled 98 million users about data collection through its “Web & App Activity” setting[1]. The case revealed Google continued gathering user data via Firebase, a monitoring database embedded in 97% of top Android apps and 54% of leading iOS apps, even after users disabled data collection[1:1].

Google’s internal communications showed the company was “intentionally vague” about its data collection practices because being transparent “could sound alarming to users,” according to district judge Richard Seeborg[1:2].

This ruling adds to Google’s recent privacy settlements, including:

  • $392 million paid to 40 states in 2023 for location tracking violations
  • $40 million to Washington state for similar location tracking issues
  • $1.38 billion to Texas in 2025 over location tracking and incognito mode claims[1:3]

Google plans to appeal the $425 million verdict, with spokesperson Jose Castaneda stating “This decision misunderstands how our products work” and asserting that Google honors user privacy choices[1:4].


  1. Malwarebytes - Google misled users about their privacy and now owes them $425m, says court ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure Google profited more than $425 million by doing so.

    This is just part of the cost of doing business.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Great

    So lawyers get half right off the bat. Leaves 212 ish million.

    This affected how many, let’s say 1 billion users. Your privacy is worth 25 cents.

    Oh and let’s not forget google gets to keep that data it illegally collected.

  • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They continued harvesting data from users after the users explicitly disabled an option to shut that off. And for that, they owe $4 a person. When are we going to starting fining these companies properly? How about a thousand dollars a person for an infraction like this? Maybe a $98 billion fine might get them to start caring.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    $425m is chump change to google, and they’re still trying to get out of it. Shows how unfathomably greedy these parasites are.

    • boaratio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Zuckerberg has two $200m yachts. Google execs could probably find $425m in their couch cushions.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The case revealed Google continued gathering user data via Firebase, a monitoring database embedded in 97% of top Android apps and 54% of leading iOS apps, even after users disabled data collection

    This is why we can’t have nice things.

    • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, a lot of people believe this. Privacy and security only depends on the ethics and intentions of the dev or company, not of the license of their product. A lot of mal/spyware is FLOSS, even Googles tracking APIs (eg.googleanalytics, google-tagmanager, etc), included in a lot of FOSS, is.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Google plans to appeal the $425 million verdict with a judge who will ‘mysteriously’ buy a mansion after the case”

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Last week I created a temporary google account using an address from my own domain. The other day Google sent a mail that the account is restricted and I need to verify my age first. I’m located in central EU, why is Google doing this?

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even with the small amount per user, they better be forced to pay in real checks or similar. Not in Play Store gift cards/credits, as I imagine that is what they will want to do if their appeal fails.