• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I have a simple flowchart to determine what is or isn’t a veggie:

    > Can I eat it? -> Yes -> Does it come from an animal? -> No = Vegetable

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Vegetables aren’t real. They made up the classification just to sell things that aren’t fruits.

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Fruit has a botanical and a culinary definition.

    Vegetable only has a culinary definition.

    Trying to decide on what food fits which category purely on the botanical definition of fruit is silly. In many other languages, the botanical and culinary definition even use completely different words. It’s like saying lobster is red meat using a scientific definition of red.

    But if we are having fun with this, rhubarb: definitely no fruit, but far too sweet, too often consumed raw or minimally processed, and far too at home in a yoghurt to fit nicely into the group vegetable.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    In spanish tomatoes are called “hortalizas”, the others are “verduras” apart of “frutas”, fruits, in english only traduced with vegetables and fruits. Maybe because Spain has a better food culture. Mushrooms are something in between plants and animals in a separate genre, some even are actively moving to find food. The US anyway differences only protein, sugar and decoration, tomatoes in bottles from Heinz.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Tomatoes will always be a vegetable to me. And I base that entirely on vibes.