HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoThe duality of particleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageThe duality of particleslemmy.worldHonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarejan teli@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIf it goes back to just two lines when you look at it, how’d they figure out there’s more of them when you’re not looking?
minus-squareIlIllIIIllIlIlIIlI@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoMeasure, not look. Measure implies interaction. That’s why the result changes.
minus-squareEchoCT@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoLook up the double slit experiment. Then consider the characters pov.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIt’s not just looking. The implication of the person looking is he’s looking at which path the light took through the slit. If you measure which slit the particle of light went through, the pattern disappears.
If it goes back to just two lines when you look at it, how’d they figure out there’s more of them when you’re not looking?
Measure, not look. Measure implies interaction. That’s why the result changes.
Look up the double slit experiment. Then consider the characters pov.
It’s not just looking. The implication of the person looking is he’s looking at which path the light took through the slit. If you measure which slit the particle of light went through, the pattern disappears.