• blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Downvoting because this doesn’t really have anything to do with science. Also because it isn’t funny. I support the message, though

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    In advanced countries the public transport isn’t a problem, only the USA is 50 years behind.

    Railway map EU vs USA

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    This is already the case in many places where it’s possible. It would be a huge waste of resources though, in places that are thinly populated.

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 days ago

      That’s weird. I thought it was everyone driving their own cars all the time that was a huge waste of resources.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        With work hours being what they are, you don’t have set times where everyone needs to be at work or go home at the same time. It rural areas, having public transport so often that “you don’t need to check a schedule” would mean empty busses and trails most of the time.

        For me, I can tell that I have lived in a city where this was the case. It was great! But where I live now, this isn’t possible. The narrative now is, that people should move into towns, to make this more effective. There is a very fine balance between effectiveness though, and industrialization of living conditions.

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          I mean, you are correct that building an entire rail line to a single farm to take the farmer’s kids to school would be extremely inefficient. We need farms, and farmers, and those farmers need to be able to get around, and the way for them to get around is personal automobiles.

          But the argument “farmers need cars so we still need cars” is not really an argument in favor of auto-intensive infrastructure. It is a edge case, and we should design cities around the needs of the average person and make allowances for edge cases, not the other way around.

        • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          The meme is specifically about cities, so when you said “thinly populated,” that should have been about thinly populated areas of cities.

          If you’re actually talking about rural areas and not cities, then you’d want to start with buses. Speaking of living in places with good public transit, I used to live in Japan, and I was surprised by how much buses get used in rural areas. They can get pretty full.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Yeah, they put busses into my exurb and they hardly have anyone riding them because they just connect one shopping center to a different shopping center to the library to the bus depot to &c. (never any residential). Only busses that stop in residential are schoolbusses. Now they wonder why no one uses the local bus. Or not.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    I want teleporters so I can roll out of bed, shit on the floor and it goes straight to the compost, take a shower, mid shower grab some coffee from the good coffee shop, fart my way to work which is halfway across the globe and takes a hop skip and telejump to get to. I have dinner in Moosejaw and dessert in Ayacucho. I go to sleep in Rwanda and wake in Borneo. I really should do less drugs. Or more drugs. I can’t remember anymore. So it looks like more drugs.