Archive link: https://archive.ph/z2UBM

If the Trump administration was expecting it’d quickly wrap up its “little excursion” in Iran like in a repeat of Venezuela, geopolitical reality had different ideas.

On Wednesday, the Iranian government said it was ready for a long war that would “destroy” the global economy, Le Monde reported, as it continues to shut down a key passageway for oil supplies, the Strait of Hormuz.

“Get ready for the oil barrel to be at $200 because the oil price depends on the regional stability which you have destabilised,” Ebrahim Zolfaqari, a spokesperson for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, told Reuters. Oil prices have surged since February 28, when the US and Israel opened aggressions by assassinating Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei in a series of missile strikes that also killed the commander of the IRGC, the minister of defense, and other top brass. The strikes have also killed more than 1,000 civilians. One US Tomahawk missile struck an elementary school, killing at least 175 people including numerous students in a massacre that’s now under investigation by the Pentagon.

The regime has not collapsed, as some Trump officials may have hoped, and it retaliated by launching its own campaign of missile and drone strikes across US allies in the Middle East. The IRGC has vowed that not a “single liter of oil” would pass through the Strait of Hormuz to hostile nations. Approximately 20 percent of the world’s global oil supplies flow through the passage, where Iran has cut off shipping traffic for the past two weeks. The strait connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, providing the only route to the open ocean for supertankers carrying oil from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE, Iran, and others.

Two oil vessels were struck with explosions in an Iraqi port on Thursday, in suspected Iranian attacks. Three other cargo ships were also struck and set ablaze in the Gulf hours before. The IRGC has claimed responsibility for at least one of those attacks, a Thai bulk carrier. Whether the gravity of the situation has sunk in for US leadership is an open question. The day before the seeming escalations in the Gulf, Donald Trump declared that the US had already won the war.

Iran’s newly appointed supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei redoubled pressure on oil markets Thursday. In his first public message since being appointed mere days ago, Khamenei affirmed that the Strait of Hormuz should remain closed, adding his demand that all US bases in the region should be closed, per Reuters. Last week, Brent crude oil prices reached over $100 per barrel for the first time since 2022, peaking at nearly $120 per barrel on Monday, sending shudders throughout the economy. Gas prices in the US have surged to an average of over $3.50 per gallon, according to AAA, and are already soaring far past that point on the West Coast.

The International Energy Agency said the ongoing war has caused the largest disruption to global oil supplies in history. On Wednesday, it announced that member countries would release 400 million barrels of oil from emergency stockpiles, itself a historic figure, to dampen surging oil prices. The US said it would chip in with 172 million barrels from its ​Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Despite the announcement, Brent crude rose more than 8 percent to over $100 per barrel overnight, Axios reported. President Trump was transparent that the strain on oil markets would provide a windfall for US producers.

“The United States is the largest Oil Producer in the World, by far, so when oil prices go up, we make a lot of money,” he wrote in a post on Truth Social, his social media site.

  • La Dame d'Azur@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    The year is 500 BC. Persia is a regional powerhouse. The West struggles to overcome.

    The year is 620 AD. Persia is a regional powerhouse. The West struggles to overcome.

    The year is 1588 AD. Persia is a regional powerhouse. The West struggles to overcome.

    The year is 2026 AD. Persia is a regional powerhouse. The West struggles to overcome.

  • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m skeptical of the phrasing because it sounds like a loaded headline to make it out as if Iran wants to destroy the whole global economy for everybody (which doesn’t fit with, if I’m not mistaken, their selective blocking of the Strait of Hormuz, not blocking it for literally everybody).

    The only direct quote I can find is from the Le Monde article the futurism one links to that says:

    Iran said on Wednesday, March 11, it was ready for a long war of attrition that would “destroy” the world economy, after firing on two commercial ships and threatening any vessels from the United States or its allies.

    And from the linked reuters article where it says:

    “Get ready for oil to be $200 a barrel, because the oil price depends on regional security, which you have destabilised,” Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran’s military command, said in comments addressed to Washington.

    After offices of a bank in Tehran were hit overnight, Zolfaqari said Iran ​would respond with attacks on banks that do business with the U.S. or Israel. People across the Middle East should stay 1,000 metres from banks, he added.

    Which is clearly speaking threateningly toward the entity that is directly attacking Iran, the western empire (an entity whose ears would perk up when you mention financial problems), not the whole world. I mean, it even says “addressed to Washington” lol.

    I could see Iran wanting to put a wrecking ball through the western empire’s version of “global economy”, which is based on exploitation and military dominance, and does incredible damage to the region Iranians call home. And if we consider “global economy” to mean that unipolar dominance, then maybe it’s technically the truth.

    But for a casual reader, based on these sources and what else I have seen thus far, I suspect it is western sources once again being misleading to vilify their current target, trying to make it seem as if Iran is the aggressor.

    • Jarmund@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not only that but it also is deceptive.

      Why would Iran disrupt the whole literal global economy it itself is a part of? The material basis insist that for a sustained war of attrition it would need revenue to finance said war… and from what? Oil revenues. So yes what the article concieves as the “global market” it just means western economies

      And as always that tump quote from his social media is so fucking dumb it should not even be there.

      This article is crap

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not just Western economies. Everyone else had to comply with Iran’s economic isolation because of secondary sanctions, which apply to anyone who does business with Iran. If India buys Iran’s oil, suddenly India is facing sanctions. It’d be more accurate to identify this as the dollar-based global economy, which includes basically everyone since almost all global trade is done in USD.

        What Iran is doing is destroying the dollar as the global reserve currency, and the transition is going to be painful for everyone.