• aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him)@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Imagine using something dangerous to generate power or heat for a home. Something that if it leaks into your home could suffocate you overnight or explode, or that in normal use can give children respiratory issues or cause cancer. Thank goodness we’re too smart to use something like that unlike the absolute imbeciles in this comic

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 days ago

      Imagine if we had to move it around in such large quantities that there were thousands of kilometres of unwatched pipelines just out there, potentially leaking.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 days ago

      And imagine people fight pointless wars over resources instead of using the renewables that are available for free.

    • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not only that, but mining for it produces massive quantities of dangerous runoff and radioactive waste. Good thing coal doesn’t do that!

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Could you imagine a world where we first used atomic power for good and not evil?

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Not really. It’s not economical and never has been. Civilian use of nuclear energy has only ever been a cover for nuclear arms development.

  • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    So was the popular conception back then that power was somehow magically transferred directly from uranium to the power grid?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      What grid? It looks like the “power box” on the wall is generating power for that house all by itself, no transmission necessary.

      Considering that the smallest operating nuclear reactor ever made was this big…

      SNAP-10A nuclear reactor

      …and that critical mass is a thing, I can only assume the “power box” was some kind of RTG.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Wouldn’t all but the largest RTGs struggle to power more than a few incandescent light bulbs, though? Looking at the table on Wikipedia, their output is usually only from a few dozen to a few hundred watts.

        • vane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          It was 60 years ago. If they put same effort to it as they put to computers you would have one in your pocket.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            RTGs aren’t as limited by technological investment as they are constrained by fundamental physics.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It was worse than that. Our understanding of radiation took awhile. While Uranium glass is probably safe I wouldn’t go using it regularly. A lot of women (“radium girls”) suffered from cancers induced by licking their brushes when painting luminescing instruments. This comic looks like 50s era when post the bomb sci-fi was full of “atomics” as the stuff of the future.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    $ 0.001

    The Jetsons/strangelove era pricing for nuclear energy was based on fuel costs only, and certainly scale was needed rather than this absurd wafer system. The fuel costs were based on no one using any yet, and maybe children yearning for the cancer.

  • mactrl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    tell me you dont understand how nuclear-powered energy without telling me you dont understand nuclear-powered energy