A few years ago anything you wanted to search for would generate hundreds of pages of results. From sources all over. If you structured your query well you could dramatically cut down the irrelevant results and then spend a bit of time skimming through the offerings until you found your target.

Searching felt like a hunt, it could take you to far flung corners of the web, and hitting the jackpot on some obscure forum was part of the fun.

Now searching anything feels incredibly frustrating. You know what you are looking for is out there somewhere but it feels impossible getting to it. Basically we have only two main routes now, Google and Bing (and I swear Bing is just copying Google’s homework). I’ve tried a handful of others and they all fall very short.

Something has changed dramatically under the hood.

It seems like the results are very shallow and no amount of prodding will get either search engine to produce anything besides the laziest output. Any subject has a limited pool of sites they lean on and then pretend that that’s all of the Internet.

It generalizes very quickly and if you try to counter by putting things in quotations it gives up.

Even in the rare moments I’ve buckled and used their stupid AI, it takes even more time browbeating the program to just deliver the damned specifics.

What is going on??

How do we get our old search back?

I swear every day of trying to navigate the web feels worse than the day before.

How did we get here?

There’s got to be something better, right? Or something we can do to pave a new structure that benefits the denizens of the web better than the lazy slop our tech overlords scrape off the table for us. What can we do?

  • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    As others have mentioned, it was engineered to be worse for the capitalists to make profits from ads and the statistics to look better to shareholders. This in turn has made people to create a shit ton of garbage articles and blogs that say a ton while saying nothing, so even if you used a new search engine with the funding of Google but the algorithm of back then it would still be shit probably, because the volume of shit on the internet has now reached a level where finding anything in it is impossible.

    The explosion of AI has come right at this moment where search engines have been lobotomized and gives people an option to be able to find things again, which is also another factor contributing to the profits of the AI companies, but even that is limited to what an LLM can average out from the totality of information that it has been fed and has the obvious danger of making stuff up and treating its biased training data as truth.

    Generally, I think we’re fucked. I really don’t know if we’re ever going to get back the internet experience that once existed and what it’s going to take to get there, but it would probably involve a massive societal change to come before it.

    • MrOtingocni@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      At this point I think the only way forward is for enough like-minded people to sort of stake their claim on some semi-walled off portion of the internet and greatly limit access from swaths of IP addresses.

      Sort of like web rings 2.0. Everyone, or enough people, will have to chip in on costs and provide either money or hardware.

      There will have to be some sort of regulatory body with voting members.

      To be ‘in’ the site has to abide by certain advertising restrictions and privacy agreements.

      A decent use (finally) for llms would be to audit the private index and remove slop. I think we’re just at the beginning of what will be a resource hogging AI arms race.

      It’s sort of what we’ve been trying to avoid since the beginning but it seems inevitable at this point.

    • NoLemurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’d add that traditional search can’t reasonably hope to compete with AI in this environment. If you’re running a traditional search engine right now, there’s a real argument that the best business decision is to accelerate the enshitification to capture as much value as you can from your remaining audience while you still have it.

      This is the usual cycle with these sorts of technologies - once a replacement arrives, the natural choice is to shift from growth to exploitation.

      This is going to get worse before it gets better.

  • NahMarcas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I have a bunch of Search engines where they say different things about your search (I combine it with noscript because fuck JS)

    Startpage: you need JS to verification, basicaly is an API from google.

    Mojeek: also JS verification, their results are focus in local websites (.es .nl .de).

    Searx.be: you need write a code before start use it, index all the fediverse, opensource frontends and scientific works in an anti-massmedia site, also can fail in specific searchs.

    I trying different ones, because as you say is not realiable anymore so I have to act as if I asking help to a bunch of greddy friends with their own interests

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I have not had good luck with any search engine I’ve used lately, even Kagi. I pretty much have to go directly on the website I expect to find what I’m looking for and search there now. Also I suspect that with AI people might be posting in forums less now.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    People with bad info put more effort into SEO than people with good info. Google changing focus from getting people good results to getting people to stay on their site. Powers that be filling the web with misinformation. There’s always been conspiracies and misinformation on the internet, but now there’s major money in pushing it.

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    SEO. Everybody is blaming corporations but nobody today can develop a search engine that can’t be spammed. If they could, they would.

    • MrOtingocni@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If only we (the collective users) spent more time creating a framework and vision of how the Internet should develop and aggressively pushed back on attempts to deviate from it…

      When the people refuse to convene a governing body with teeth, the vacuum is filled with opportunists.

      In a sense we are suffering from our own success. A place where anybody can build anything they want digitally. Left a ripe field for unrestrained commercial interests to infest the whole thing. Now it is bloated with human and AI slop to such a degree it smothers everything else and every major tech push is tuned towards data scraping every morsel.

  • blackbrook@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    There are leaked emails from Google (from many years ago) where it was proposed to purposely degrade search quality to increase ad clicks. While some at Google responded with dismay as this, it is not a great leap to assume that this faction eventually won and they did in fact deliberately do that. Advertising is Google’s main revenue source, they are clearly motivated to do so.

  • Lonk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think they intentionally made search engines worse to push people into using LLM’s

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    SEO did this. It started before LLM and chatGPT. Blogger make money be generating trafic. So they wrote shits in a format that please search engine.

    That’s why if you search “search into file Linux”, instead of just a grep command line, you end up on 2000 lines article with introduction, paragraph, explanation, blablabla. Because search engine boost this kind of content. Title, introduction paragraph that repeat the title, subsections, etc…

  • steve_freiheit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been using metasearch engines (engines that pass your query to multiple search engines so you can aggregate them easily) and the two I’ve been using were pretty good in my experience. 4get.ca and degoog.org.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never seen any search engine officially confirm this, but search across all search engines became terrible just a few months after the release of ChatGPT.
    Which is why my assumption is that LLMs are being used to generate heaps of credible-looking, but ultimately worthless webpages. And search engines have to try to filter those out or their results would be even worse.

    But then there’s no obvious distinction between a human-crafted blog and some spam webpage, which means the human-crafted blog is likely to be caught in the crossfire and get filtered as well.

    Well, and on top of that, search engines presumably got hit by AI scrapers looking for training data, so that’s why I would assume, they now limit the search results to one page…

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah. Noticed this too. Pages that look legit but are filled with useless word salad that doesn’t go anywhere.

      Gives you an impression that those pages didn’t exist before your search. How it got to top results is beyond me.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you’re not paying for it, then you’re not the user, you’re the product.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you’re paying for it you’re definitely either already the product, or will be eventually when the company sells out.

        The only enshittification-resistant choice is copyleft Free Software.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          A search service is different from the Linux kernel or a web server though. You can release the perfect open source search engine, but running it will be expensive. If we, as users, aren’t paying for it, then someone is going to have to extract value from us to pay for it.